Cyclical Parthenogenesis and Viviparity in Aphids as Evolutionary Novelties

ABSTRACT Evolutionary novelties represent challenges to biologists, particularly those who would like to understand the developmental and genetic changes responsible for their appearance. Most modern aphids possess two apparent evolutionary novelties: cyclical parthenogenesis (a life cycle with both...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution Vol. 318; no. 6; pp. 448 - 459
Main Author DAVIS, GREGORY K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Evolutionary novelties represent challenges to biologists, particularly those who would like to understand the developmental and genetic changes responsible for their appearance. Most modern aphids possess two apparent evolutionary novelties: cyclical parthenogenesis (a life cycle with both sexual and asexual phases) and viviparity (internal development and live birth of progeny) in their asexual phase. Here I discuss the evolution of these apparent novelties from a developmental standpoint. Although a full understanding of the evolution of cyclical parthenogenesis and viviparity in aphids can seem a daunting task, these complex transitions can at least be broken down into a handful of steps. I argue that these should include the following: a differentiation of two developmentally distinct oocytes; de novo synthesis of centrosomes and modification of meiosis during asexual oogenesis; a loss or bypass of any cell cycle arrest and changes in key developmental events during viviparous oogenesis; and a change in how mothers specify the sexual vs. asexual fates of their progeny. Grappling with the nature of such steps and the order in which they occurred ought to increase our understanding and reduce the apparent novelty of complex evolutionary transitions. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 318B:448–459, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada - No. 410-2008-0400
istex:210076091FCD0C54A6C6471945000E11F7BAADE0
National Science Foundation - No. IOS-1051643
ark:/67375/WNG-V1BKXDKR-M
ArticleID:JEZB22441
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1552-5007
1552-5015
DOI:10.1002/jez.b.22441