Is the Isolated-Tip Needle-Knife Precut as Effective as Conventional Precut Fistulotomy in Difficult Biliary Cannulation?

Needle-knife precut fistulotomy (NK-F) is a well-known freehand technique for difficult biliary cannulation (DBC). Another approach involves the use of Iso-Tome , a modified precutting device with an insulated needle tip to prevent direct thermal injury. This comparative study aimed to evaluate the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut and liver Vol. 12; no. 5; pp. 597 - 605
Main Authors Lee, Tae Hoon, Park, Sang-Heum, Yang, Jae Kook, Han, Su Jung, Park, Suyeon, Choi, Hyun Jong, Lee, Yun Nah, Cha, Sang-Woo, Moon, Jong Ho, Cho, Young Deok
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 01.09.2018
Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver
거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Needle-knife precut fistulotomy (NK-F) is a well-known freehand technique for difficult biliary cannulation (DBC). Another approach involves the use of Iso-Tome , a modified precutting device with an insulated needle tip to prevent direct thermal injury. This comparative study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the Iso-Tome precut (IT-P) compared to that of NK-F for DBC. Patients with a naïve papilla who underwent early IT-P or NK-F for DBC were enrolled. DBC was defined as failure to achieve selective biliary access by wire-guided cannulation despite 5 minutes of attempted cannulation, ≥5 papillary contacts, or a hooknose-shaped papilla. The primary endpoint was the primary technical success rate, which was based on a noninferiority model. A total of 239 DBC cases were enrolled. The primary technical success rates were 74.7% (89/119) in the IT-P group and 91.6% (110/120) in the NK-F group (lower limit of 90% confidence interval, -0.23; p=0.927 for a noninferiority margin of 10%). The total technical success rates were 87.4% and 95.0%, respectively (p=0.038). The mean precutting times for successful biliary access were 11.2 minutes for IT-P and 7.3 minutes for NK-F (p<0.01). The procedure-related adverse event rates were 9.2% for IT-P and 5.8% for NK-F (p=0.318). The rates of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis were 4.2% and 2.5%, respectively (p=0.499). IT-P failed to exhibit noninferiority compared with NK-F regarding the primary technical success rate of DBC, but there was no difference in the frequency of adverse events.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-News-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:1976-2283
2005-1212
DOI:10.5009/gnl17572