Validation of the MSM and NCI Method for Estimating the Usual Intake of Nutrients and Food According to Four Seasons of Seven Consecutive Daily 24 Hour Dietary Recalls in Chinese Adults

• Published in: Nutrients Vol. 14; no. 3; p. 445
• Main Authors: Huang, Kun, Yu, Dongmei, Guo, Qiya, Yang, Yuxiang, Wei, Xiaoqi, Zhao, Liyun, Fang, Hongyun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 19.01.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Adult; Adults; Cancer; Chronic illnesses; Diet; dietary components; Dietary intake; Disease; Estimates; Food; Food intake; Humans; Mean; MSM; National Cancer Institute (U.S.); NCI; Nutrients; Nutrition; Nutrition research; Nutrition surveys; percentage difference; Questionnaires; Regression analysis; Seasons; Statistical methods; Surveillance; United States; usual intake; validation; United States; China; comparison; NCI; MSM; dietary components; usual intake; percentage difference; validation
• ISSN: 2072-6643; 2072-6643
• DOI: 10.3390/nu14030445

The Multiple Source Method (MSM) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) method are used to estimate usual dietary intake from short-term dietary assessment instruments, such as 24 hour dietary recall (24-HRs). However, their performance has not been validated in the Chinese population via nutrition surveys. To validate the accuracy of the MSM and NCI method in estimating usual dietary intake in the Chinese population, 752 individuals from northern and southern China answered four seasons of seven consecutive 24-HRs (one for each season). The true usual dietary intake was considered as the average of the 28 collection days of dietary component intake. Using data sets with consecutive 3 collection days, the usual intakes of the selected dietary components were estimated by MSM, NCI and the within-person mean of three 24-HRs (3 day method). These estimates were compared with the true usual intake at the group and individual level. At the group level, the MSM and NCI method performed similarly, yielding estimates closer to the true usual intake than 3 day method. The percentage differences of the estimates for dietary components not consumed daily from the MSM and NCI method were larger than for the dietary components consumed daily. However, the larger percentage differences were observed in the tail of the usual intake distribution. In general, dietary components with larger variance ratios had greater percentage differences. At the individual level, for overall seasons and dietary components, the biases of individual usual intake did agree for MSM and NCI method, whereas NCI method estimates were closer to true intakes than for the MSM and 3 day method. Similar results were observed in the relative biases of dietary components consumed daily. As with the group level, there was less percentage difference in dietary components consumed daily. Both the MSM and NCI method can be used to estimate usual intake in Chinese populations and are closer to the true usual intake than the traditional mean method, at both group and individual levels.