Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Total, Abdominal and Visceral Fat Mass: A Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Sports medicine (Auckland) Vol. 48; no. 2; pp. 269 - 288
• Main Authors: Maillard, Florie, Pereira, Bruno, Boisseau, Nathalie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.02.2018; Springer Nature B.V; Springer Verlag
• Subjects: Abdomen; Adipose tissue; Aerobics; Body composition; Body fat; Body weight; Computed tomography; Cytokines; Diabetes; Exercise; Heart rate; Insulin resistance; Interval training; Life Sciences; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Meta-analysis; Metabolic disorders; Metabolic syndrome; Obesity; Overweight; Performance evaluation; Physical fitness; Physiology; Review Article; Running; Sports Medicine; Sports training; Strength training; Tumor necrosis factor-TNF; Womens health
• ISSN: 0112-1642; 1179-2035; 1179-2035
• DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0807-y

Background High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is promoted as a time-efficient strategy to improve body composition. Objective The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of HIIT in reducing total, abdominal, and visceral fat mass in normal-weight and overweight/obese adults. Methods Electronic databases were searched to identify all related articles on HIIT and fat mass. Stratified analysis was performed using the nature of HIIT (cycling versus running, target intensity), sex and/or body weight, and the methods of measuring body composition. Heterogeneity was also determined Results A total of 39 studies involving 617 subjects were included (mean age 38.8 years ± 14.4, 52% females). HIIT significantly reduced total ( p   =  0.003), abdominal ( p   =  0.007), and visceral ( p   =  0.018) fat mass, with no differences between the sexes. A comparison showed that running was more effective than cycling in reducing total and visceral fat mass. High-intensity (above 90% peak heart rate) training was more successful in reducing whole body adiposity, while lower intensities had a greater effect on changes in abdominal and visceral fat mass. Our analysis also indicated that only computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging showed significant abdominal and/or visceral fat-mass loss after HIIT interventions. Conclusion HIIT is a time-efficient strategy to decrease fat-mass deposits, including those of abdominal and visceral fat mass. There was some evidence of the greater effectiveness of HIIT running versus cycling, but owing to the wide variety of protocols used and the lack of full details about cycling training, further comparisons need to be made. Large, multicenter, prospective studies are required to establish the best HIIT protocols for reducing fat mass according to subject characteristics.