The effect of inclined step stool on the quality of chest compression during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation

• Published in: The American journal of emergency medicine Vol. 32; no. 8; pp. 851 - 855
• Main Authors: Yun, Seong-Woo, EMT, PhD, Lee, Byung Kook, MD, PhD, Jeung, Kyung Woon, MD, PhD, Park, Sang Wook, EMT, MS, Choi, Sung Soo, EMT, MS, Lee, Chang-Hee, EMT, PhD, Ryu, So-Yeon, MD, PhD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2014; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Adult; Autumn; Baby supplies; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - instrumentation; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods; Chairs; CPR; Cross-Over Studies; Emergency; Emergency medical care; Female; Heart Massage - instrumentation; Heart Massage - methods; Humans; Male; Manikins; Posture; Retailing; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0735-6757; 1532-8171
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.04.008

Abstract Purpose A step stool is an ordinary device to improve the quality of chest compression (CC) during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We investigated the effect of an inclined step stool on the quality of CC during CPR on a hospital bed. Methods We conducted a randomized crossover study of simulation using a manikin. Two different methods of CC were performed and compared: CC using a flat stool and CC using an inclined (20°) stool. Each session of CC was performed for 2 minutes using a metronome at a rate of 110 beats per minute. The primary outcome was the depth of CC. The adequate CC rate, duty cycle, rate of incomplete recoil, and the angle between the arm of the participants and the bed were also measured. Results The median value of the mean depth of CC was 50.5 mm (45.0-57.0 mm) in the flat stool group and 54.5 mm (47.0-58.3 mm) in the inclined stool group ( P = .014). The adequate CC rate was significantly higher in the inclined stool group (84.2% [37.6%-99.1%] vs 57.0% [15.2%-95.0%]; P = .016). The duty cycle and the rate of incomplete recoil were comparable between the 2 groups. The angles between the arm of the participants and the bed were more vertical in the inclined stool group (84.0° ± 5.2° vs 81.0° ± 4.8°; P = .014). Conclusion Using an inclined stool resulted in an improvement in the depth of CC and the adequate CC rate without increasing the rate of incomplete chest recoil.