On organic emissions testing from indoor consumer products’ use

•Three widely used consumer products were tested for their organic compound emissions.•Three test chambers from different laboratories (0.26, 0.92, 20.24m3) were used.•Emissions of the measured concentration were calculated by fit-for-purpose models.•Terpenes’ emission levels per product are given b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of hazardous materials Vol. 285; pp. 37 - 45
Main Authors Bartzis, J., Wolkoff, P., Stranger, M., Efthimiou, G., Tolis, E.I., Maes, F., Nørgaard, A.W., Ventura, G., Kalimeri, K.K., Goelen, E., Fernandes, O.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 21.03.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Three widely used consumer products were tested for their organic compound emissions.•Three test chambers from different laboratories (0.26, 0.92, 20.24m3) were used.•Emissions of the measured concentration were calculated by fit-for-purpose models.•Terpenes’ emission levels per product are given based on the three chamber testing.•Emphasis is given on the variability of the results among the different chambers. A wide range of consumer and personal care products may, during their use, release significant amounts of volatile organic compounds (VOC) into the air. The identification and quantification of the emissions from such sources is typically performed in emission test chambers. A major question is to what degree the obtained emissions are reproducible and directly applicable to real situations. The present work attempts partly to address this question by comparison of selected VOC emissions in specific consumer products tested in chambers of various dimensions. The measurements were performed in three test chambers of different volumes (0.26–20m3). The analytic performance of the laboratories was rigorously assessed prior to chamber testing. The results show emission variation for major VOC (terpenes); however, it remains in general, within the same order of magnitude for all tests. This variability does not seem to correlate with the chamber volume. It rather depends on the overall testing conditions. The present work is undertaken in the frame of EPHECT European Project.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0304-3894
1873-3336
DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.11.024