Making Heritage in Hong Kong: A Case Study of the Central Police Station Compound

This article is a case study of state–society–capital conflicts over the preservation of the Central Police Station (CPS) compound in Hong Kong during 2003–08. The conflict was between two fundamentally different approaches to urban space: a cultural economy approach that took culture and space as a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe China quarterly (London) Vol. 202; no. 202; pp. 381 - 399
Main Author Ku, Agnes Shuk-mei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.06.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article is a case study of state–society–capital conflicts over the preservation of the Central Police Station (CPS) compound in Hong Kong during 2003–08. The conflict was between two fundamentally different approaches to urban space: a cultural economy approach that took culture and space as a source of economic profit, and an opposition discourse of preservation that emphasized cultural, historical and humanistic values as an end. The struggle turned out to be a moderate success for anti-commercialism. Drawing on and extending the notions of collective memory and spatial politics, this article examines how the various civil society actors, in their struggle against commercialism, sought to define and enhance the cultural value of the site through a variety of discourses and practices relating to history and space. It addresses the specific question of why and how certain constructions of collective memory succeed (or fail) to work with certain places in particular instances. The study shows that memories of the CPS compound contained both state-associated and people-associated accounts, between which the former prevailed. The state-associated account was embedded in a familiar, hegemonic story about Hong Kong, which, via an abstract process of symbolization around the notion of the rule of law, successfully turned the compound into an iconic symbol of identification for the city. Beyond this, the civil society actors sought also to generate a sense of lived space associated with the people, and the outcome was mixed.
Bibliography:istex:0897DA43D891B2CDB57C89925FDBAFA85FC9E561
ArticleID:00029
PII:S0305741010000299
ark:/67375/6GQ-L4TPWC3M-T
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0305-7410
1468-2648
DOI:10.1017/S0305741010000299