The Dominant Role of CD8⁺ Dendritic Cells in Cross-Presentation Is Not Dictated by Antigen Capture

Mouse spleens contain three populations of conventional ($CD11c^{high}$) dendritic cells (DCs) that play distinct functions. The CD8⁺ DC are unique in that they can present exogenous antigens on their MHC class I molecules, a process known as cross-presentation. It is unclear whether this special ab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 103; no. 28; pp. 10729 - 10734
Main Authors Schnorrer, Petra, Behrens, Georg M. N., Wilson, Nicholas S., Pooley, Joanne L., Smith, Christopher M., El-Sukkari, Dima, Davey, Gayle, Kupresanin, Fiona, Li, Ming, Maraskovsky, Eugene, Belz, Gabrielle T., Carbone, Francis R., Shortman, Ken, Heath, William R., Villadangos, Jose A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 11.07.2006
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Mouse spleens contain three populations of conventional ($CD11c^{high}$) dendritic cells (DCs) that play distinct functions. The CD8⁺ DC are unique in that they can present exogenous antigens on their MHC class I molecules, a process known as cross-presentation. It is unclear whether this special ability is because only the CD8⁺ DC can capture the antigens used in cross-presentation assays, or because this is the only DC population that possesses specialized machinery for cross-presentation. To solve this important question we examined the splenic DC subsets for their ability to both present via MHC class II molecules and cross-present via MHC class I using four different forms of the model antigen ovalbumin (OVA). These forms include a cell-associated form, a soluble form, OVA expressed in bacteria, or OVA bound to latex beads. With the exception of bacterial antigen, which was poorly cross-presented by all DC, all antigenic forms were cross-presented much more efficiently by the CD8⁺ DC. This pattern could not be attributed simply to a difference in antigen capture because all DC subsets presented the antigen via MHC class II. Indeed, direct assessments of endocytosis showed that CD8⁺ and CD8⁻ DC captured comparable amounts of soluble and bead-associated antigen, yet only the CD8⁺ DC cross-presented these antigenic forms. Our results indicate that cross-presentation requires specialized machinery that is expressed by CD8⁺ DC but largely absent from CD8⁻ DC. This conclusion has important implications for the design of vaccination strategies based on antigen targeting to DC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Present address: CSL Ltd., Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Present address: Division of Clinical Immunology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
P.S., G.M.N.B., and N.S.W. contributed equally to this work.
Edited by Peter Cresswell, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, and approved May 26, 2006
Present address: Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom.
Author contributions: F.R.C., K.S., W.R.H., and J.A.V. designed research; P.S., G.M.N.B., N.S.W., J.L.P., C.M.S., D.E.-S., G.D., F.K., M.L., and G.T.B. performed research; E.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; P.S., G.M.N.B., N.S.W., J.L.P., C.M.S., D.E.-S., M.L., G.T.B., and J.A.V. analyzed data; and W.R.H. and J.A.V. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.0601956103