How effective is food industry self-substantiation of food–health relationships underpinning health claims on food labels in Australia?

• Published in: Public health nutrition Vol. 22; no. 9; pp. 1686 - 1695
• Main Authors: Wellard-Cole, Lyndal, Watson, Wendy L, Hughes, Clare, Chapman, Kathy
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.06.2019
• Subjects: Australia; Bones; Calcium; Cereals; Companies; Consumers; Descriptive labeling; Enforcement; Fees & charges; Food; Food consumption; Food industry; Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence; Food Labeling - standards; Food processing industry; Government Agencies; Humans; Labels; Legislation, Food; Literature reviews; New Zealand; Nutrition; Nutritive Value; Public Health; Public Policies; Quality standards; Regulation; Regulatory agencies; Research Paper; Supermarkets; Systematic review; New Zealand; Australia; Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia; Food labelling; Food policy; Health claims; Food industry; Food regulation
• ISSN: 1368-9800; 1475-2727
• DOI: 10.1017/S1368980018004081

The Food Standards Code regulates health claims on Australian food labels. General-level health claims highlight food-health relationships, e.g. 'contains calcium for strong bones'. Food companies making claims must notify Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) and certify that a systematic literature review (SLR) substantiating the food-health relationship has been conducted. There is no pre- or post-notification assessment of the SLR, potentially enabling the food industry to make claims based on poor-quality research. The present study assessed the rigour of self-substantiation. Food-health relationships notified to FSANZ were monitored monthly between 2013 and 2017. These relationships were assessed by scoping published literature. Where evidence was equivocal/insufficient, the relevant government food regulatory agency was asked to investigate. If not investigated, or the response was unsatisfactory, the project team conducted an independent SLR which was provided to the government agency. Australia.ParticipantsSelf-substantiated food-health relationships. There were sixty-seven relationships notified by thirty-eight food companies. Of these, thirty-three relationships (52 %) from twenty companies were deemed to have sufficient published evidence. Four were excluded as they originated in New Zealand. Three relationships were removed before investigations were initiated. The project initiated twenty-seven food-health relationship investigations. Another six relationships were withdrawn, and three relationships were awaiting government assessment. To ensure that SLR underpinning food-health relationships are rigorous and reduce regulatory enforcement burden, pre-market approval of food-health relationships should be introduced. This will increase consumer and public health confidence in the regulatory process and prevent potentially misleading general-level health claims on food labels.