Morning-type and evening-type individuals differ in the phase position of their endogenous circadian oscillator

In dealing with inter-individual phase differences in overt circadian rhythms, it is often difficult to distinguish the impact of the endogenous circadian oscillator from that of an individual's habitual lifestyle. In an attempt to resolve this uncertainty about the role of masking influences,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroscience letters Vol. 218; no. 3; pp. 153 - 156
Main Authors Kerkhof, Gerard A., Van Dongen, Hans P.A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Shannon Elsevier Ireland Ltd 08.11.1996
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In dealing with inter-individual phase differences in overt circadian rhythms, it is often difficult to distinguish the impact of the endogenous circadian oscillator from that of an individual's habitual lifestyle. In an attempt to resolve this uncertainty about the role of masking influences, two groups of subjects, morning-types and evening-types, were selected and monitored during entrained, habitual sleep-wake conditions and during 24 h of controlled wakefulness in a laboratory-based constant-routine procedure. Under both conditions significant differences were observed in the circadian phases of body temperature and subjective alertness. During constant routine mean between-group differences for these two variables were 2.12 and 4.28 h, respectively. Thus, evidence is provided for the endogenous nature of momingness-eveningness.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0304-3940
1872-7972
DOI:10.1016/S0304-3940(96)13140-2