Synchrotron microbeam irradiation induces neutrophil infiltration, thrombocyte attachment and selective vascular damage in vivo

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 6; no. 1; p. 33601
• Main Authors: Brönnimann, Daniel, Bouchet, Audrey, Schneider, Christoph, Potez, Marine, Serduc, Raphaël, Bräuer-Krisch, Elke, Graber, Werner, von Gunten, Stephan, Laissue, Jean Albert, Djonov, Valentin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 19.09.2016; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 13/31; 14/19; 14/28; 631/250/1933; 631/250/2500; 631/67/1059/485; 64/116; Amputation; Bioengineering; Cell walls; Dosimetry; Humanities and Social Sciences; Inflammation; Irradiation; Leukocytes (neutrophilic); Life Sciences; Maturation; Medical Physics; Metastases; Microscopy; multidisciplinary; Neutrophils; Nuclear medicine; Physics; Platelets; Radiation therapy; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Tissues; Toxicity; Tumors; Zebrafish
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/srep33601

Our goal was the visualizing the vascular damage and acute inflammatory response to micro- and minibeam irradiation in vivo . Microbeam (MRT) and minibeam radiation therapies (MBRT) are tumor treatment approaches of potential clinical relevance, both consisting of parallel X-ray beams and allowing the delivery of thousands of Grays within tumors. We compared the effects of microbeams (25–100 μm wide) and minibeams (200–800 μm wide) on vasculature, inflammation and surrounding tissue changes during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration in vivo . Microbeam irradiation triggered an acute inflammatory response restricted to the regenerating tissue. Six hours post irradiation (6 hpi), it was infiltrated by neutrophils and fli1a + thrombocytes adhered to the cell wall locally in the beam path. The mature tissue was not affected by microbeam irradiation. In contrast, minibeam irradiation efficiently damaged the immature tissue at 6 hpi and damaged both the mature and immature tissue at 48 hpi. We demonstrate that vascular damage, inflammatory processes and cellular toxicity depend on the beam width and the stage of tissue maturation. Minibeam irradiation did not differentiate between mature and immature tissue. In contrast, all irradiation-induced effects of the microbeams were restricted to the rapidly growing immature tissue, indicating that microbeam irradiation could be a promising tumor treatment tool.