Use of the Extended Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to Predict Psychiatric Caseness in Hong Kong

The extended Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) provides information on problem behaviours and impairment measures. Western studies found impairment measures to be as good as symptom scores in predicting clinical caseness. The high levels of comorbidities among child psychiatric disorder...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChild psychiatry and human development Vol. 45; no. 6; pp. 703 - 711
Main Authors Lai, Kelly Y. C., Leung, Patrick W. L., Luk, Ernest S. L., Wong, Ann S. L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Springer US 01.12.2014
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The extended Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) provides information on problem behaviours and impairment measures. Western studies found impairment measures to be as good as symptom scores in predicting clinical caseness. The high levels of comorbidities among child psychiatric disorders also meant that disorders not specifically captured by the questionnaire could be identified. This study examines its applicability among Chinese school children in Hong Kong. Results found that impairment measures were more predictive of clinical status than were symptom scores. Children with low symptom but high impairment ratings had profiles that were intermediate between the low symptom low impairment and high symptom low impairment groups. The extended SDQ is useful in identifying children who might otherwise be missed if symptom scores alone were used in screening. The acceptance of child psychiatric care in Hong Kong is a multi-step process that depends on how symptoms are perceived.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-398X
1573-3327
DOI:10.1007/s10578-014-0439-5