Implementation of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy in primary care
To show the implementation process of IPT-G in primary care, including facilitating and obstructing factors, implementation strategies, and training and supervision of primary care professionals. Quantitative (cross-sectional and longitudinal) analysis of pre and post-knowledge tests; qualitative an...
Saved in:
Published in | Revista de saúde pública Vol. 56; p. 23 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English Portuguese |
Published |
Brazil
Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
01.01.2022
Universidade de São Paulo |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To show the implementation process of IPT-G in primary care, including facilitating and obstructing factors, implementation strategies, and training and supervision of primary care professionals.
Quantitative (cross-sectional and longitudinal) analysis of pre and post-knowledge tests; qualitative analyses of the training courses; patient recruitment; conduction of IPT-G sessions; supervision of IPT-G therapists; application of a semi-structured questionnaire to assess, investigate, and develop strategies against the identified barriers.
About 120 clinicians answered the pre-test; 84 completed the post-test. Pre- and post-test scores of IPT-G knowledge were significantly different. Twenty initially trained clinicians completed additional supervision in IPT-G. Qualitative analysis identified twelve barriers and six facilitators to IPT-G implementation in individual, organizational, and systemic contexts.
Implementation of IPT-G in primary care is a complex process with several steps. In the first step, health professionals were successfully trained in IPT-G. However, subsequent steps were more complex. Therefore, careful planning of IPT-G implementation is essential to maximize the success of this innovation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Conflict of the Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Authors’ Contribution: Study design and planning: MIPM, MPAF. Data collection, analysis and interpretation: MIPM, LWS, AC. Manuscript drafting or review: MIPM, MPAF, GS, SS, BPM, RLD. Approval of the final version: MIPM, MPAF. Public responsibility for the content of the article: MIPM, MPAF, GS, SS, BPM, RLD, LWS, AC. |
ISSN: | 0034-8910 1518-8787 1518-8787 |
DOI: | 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056003731 |