Microsatellite variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: a reciprocal test of the ascertainment bias hypothesis
Interspecific comparisons of microsatellite loci have repeatedly shown that the loci are longer and more variable in the species from which they are derived (the focal species) than are homologous loci in other (nonfocal) species. There is debate as to whether this is due to directional evolution or...
Saved in:
Published in | Molecular biology and evolution Vol. 15; no. 12; pp. 1620 - 1636 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.12.1998
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Interspecific comparisons of microsatellite loci have repeatedly shown that the loci are longer and more variable in the species from which they are derived (the focal species) than are homologous loci in other (nonfocal) species. There is debate as to whether this is due to directional evolution or to an ascertainment bias during the cloning and locus selection processes. This study tests these hypotheses by performing a reciprocal study. Eighteen perfect dinucleotide microsatellite loci identified from a Drosophila simulans library screen and 18 previously identified in an identical Drosophila melanogaster library screen were used to survey natural populations of each species. No difference between focal and nonfocal species was observed for mean PCR fragment length. However, heterozygosity and number of alleles were significantly higher in the focal species than in the nonfocal species. The most common allele in the Zimbabwe population of both species was sequenced for 31 of the 36 loci. The length of the longest stretch of perfect repeat units is, on average, longer in the focal species than in the non-focal species. There is a positive correlation between the length of the longest stretch of perfect repeats and heterozygosity. The difference in heterozygosity can thus be explained by a reduction in the length of the longest stretch of perfect repeats in the nonfocal species. Furthermore, flanking-sequence length difference was noted between the two species at 58% of the loci sequenced. These data do not support the predictions of the directional-evolution hypothesis; however, consistent with the ascertainment bias hypothesis, the lower variability in nonfocal species is an artifact of the microsatellite cloning and isolation process. Our results also suggest that the magnitude of ascertainment bias for repeat unit length is a function of the microsatellite size distribution in the genomes of different species. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Interspecific comparisons of microsatellite loci have repeatedly shown that the loci are longer and more variable in the species from which they are derived (the focal species) than are homologous loci in other (nonfocal) species. There is debate as to whether this is due to directional evolution or to an ascertainment bias during the cloning and locus selection processes. This study tests these hypotheses by performing a reciprocal study. Eighteen perfect dinucleotide microsatellite loci identified from a Drosophila simulans library screen and 18 previously identified in an identical Drosophila melanogaster library screen were used to survey natural populations of each species. No difference between focal and nonfocal species was observed for mean PCR fragment length. However, heterozygosity and number of alleles were significantly higher in the focal species than in the nonfocal species. The most common allele in the Zimbabwe population of both species was sequenced for 31 of the 36 loci. The length of the longest stretch of perfect repeat units is, on average, longer in the focal species than in the non-focal species. There is a positive correlation between the length of the longest stretch of perfect repeats and heterozygosity. The difference in heterozygosity can thus be explained by a reduction in the length of the longest stretch of perfect repeats in the nonfocal species. Furthermore, flanking-sequence length difference was noted between the two species at 58% of the loci sequenced. These data do not support the predictions of the directional-evolution hypothesis; however, consistent with the ascertainment bias hypothesis, the lower variability in nonfocal species is an artifact of the microsatellite cloning and isolation process. Our results also suggest that the magnitude of ascertainment bias for repeat unit length is a function of the microsatellite size distribution in the genomes of different species. |
Author | Hutter, C M Aquadro, C F Schug, M D |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: C M surname: Hutter fullname: Hutter, C M organization: Section of Genetics and Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: M D surname: Schug fullname: Schug, M D – sequence: 3 givenname: C F surname: Aquadro fullname: Aquadro, C F |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9866198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMoun78BCEXve2atE3SCB7Eb1C86LlM26kbaZM1SUXP_nGz7CJ68jSB952ZN_Pskk3rLBJyxNmMM52fuI_O-fbVjd5CH2aD62t8nwHLRKnZBplwkaspV1xvkglT6V2wvNwhuyG8MsaLQsptsq1LKbkuJ-TrwTTeBYjY9yYifQdvIBpnqbH0MiluMTc90AF7sO4FQkRPwba_tWCGManhlAL12JiFdw30NGKI1HU0zpFCaNBHMHZAG2ltIND558IlKZiwT7a69BU8WNc98nx99XRxO71_vLm7OL-fNoXK4pSXWvFat6qQkGHetLwRIFRdN5BJlbec5XWGhUQELlVWi-TtdNZiKQXTRZbvkePV3BTwbUzpqsGkXH3Kjm4MldRMl1yLf43purIUYjnxbGVc3jB47KqFNwP4z4qzakmr-kurWtGq1rRS_-F60VgP2P50r_Hk30zAnpQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2164_9_618 crossref_primary_10_3398_064_073_0209 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10344_012_0627_1 crossref_primary_10_1093_genetics_165_4_1959 crossref_primary_10_3390_pathogens12040535 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_margen_2008_10_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12033_009_9230_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forsciint_2004_01_015 crossref_primary_10_1534_genetics_104_029322 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41437_018_0120_z crossref_primary_10_1111_j_0014_3820_2001_tb00822_x crossref_primary_10_1093_genetics_159_2_839 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2052_2006_01422_x crossref_primary_10_1079_BER2002212 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_8286_2004_00721_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquabot_2017_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ympev_2019_02_010 crossref_primary_10_1006_mpev_1999_0681 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10811_021_02613_x crossref_primary_10_56093_ijans_v87i12_79860 crossref_primary_10_14411_eje_2009_058 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10592_011_0241_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1095_8312_2008_01116_x crossref_primary_10_1534_genetics_104_031005 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12863_017_0558_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10592_007_9322_2 crossref_primary_10_1603_0022_2585_38_3_376 crossref_primary_10_1093_molbev_msj065 crossref_primary_10_1554_0014_3820_2001_055_1717_MEIVIF_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1534_genetics_106_066613 crossref_primary_10_1186_1475_2875_13_423 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10709_011_9595_8 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2002_2324 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2006_03065_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10592_005_9081_x crossref_primary_10_1266_ggs_75_115 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1420_9101_2012_02564_x crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2583_2000_00184_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1439_0469_2008_00501_x crossref_primary_10_1534_genetics_107_080200 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ympev_2021_107123 crossref_primary_10_2307_25470697 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12862_016_0831_9 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0165105 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10722_003_6124_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00239_005_0022_6 crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_molbev_a026409 crossref_primary_10_1093_molbev_msh132 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2006_03003_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2008_03841_x crossref_primary_10_1643_CH_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_15688 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0378_1119_02_00756_4 crossref_primary_10_2307_2657133 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2019_01_072 crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_hdy_6800592 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12864_019_5516_5 crossref_primary_10_1093_genetics_150_2_777 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00438_009_0465_3 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7SS 8FD FR3 P64 RC3 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025890 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Engineering Research Database Technology Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Entomology Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology |
EISSN | 1537-1719 |
EndPage | 1636 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1093_oxfordjournals_molbev_a025890 9866198 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NIGMS NIH HHS grantid: R01 GM036431 – fundername: NIGMS NIH HHS grantid: GM36431 |
GroupedDBID | --- -E4 -~X .2P .GJ .I3 .ZR 0R~ 18M 1TH 29M 2WC 4.4 48X 53G 5VS 5WA 70D AAFWJ AAIJN AAIMJ AAJKP AAJQQ AAMDB AAMVS AAOGV AAPNW AAPQZ AAPXW AAUQX AAVAP AAVLN ABEUO ABIXL ABKDP ABLJU ABNKS ABPTD ABQLI ABQTQ ABSAR ABSMQ ABTAH ABXVV ABZBJ ACGFO ACGFS ACIPB ACIWK ACMRT ACNCT ACPRK ACUFI ACUTO ACYTK ADBBV ADEYI ADEZT ADFTL ADGZP ADHKW ADHZD ADJQC ADOCK ADRIX ADRTK ADYVW ADZTZ ADZXQ AECKG AEGPL AEJOX AEKKA AEKSI AELWJ AEMDU AENEX AENZO AEPUE AETBJ AEWNT AFFNX AFIYH AFOFC AFRAH AFULF AFXEN AGINJ AGKEF AGSYK AHMBA AHXPO AIAGR AIJHB AJEUX AKHUL AKWXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALTZX ALUQC APIBT APWMN ARIXL ASAOO ATDFG AXUDD AYOIW AZVOD BAWUL BAYMD BCRHZ BEYMZ BHONS BQDIO BQUQU BSWAC BTQHN BTRTY BVRKM C1A CAG CDBKE CGR COF CS3 CUY CVF CXTWN CZ4 DAKXR DFGAJ DIK DILTD DU5 D~K E3Z EBS ECM EE~ EIF EJD EMOBN F5P F9B FHSFR FLIZI FOTVD GAUVT GJXCC GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 H5~ HAR HH5 HW0 HZ~ IAO IGS IOX ITC J21 KOP KQ8 KSI KSN M-Z M49 MBTAY ML0 MVM N9A NGC NLBLG NMDNZ NOYVH NPM NTWIH NU- O0~ O9- OAWHX ODMLO OJQWA OK1 OVD O~Y P2P PAFKI PEELM PQQKQ Q1. Q5Y RD5 RHF RNI ROL ROX ROZ RPM RUSNO RW1 RXO RZO TEORI TJP TJX TLC TN5 TOX TR2 VQA W8F WOQ X7H XJT XSW YAYTL YHZ YKOAZ YXANX ZCA ZCG ZKX ZXP ZY4 ~02 ~91 AAYXX ABEJV CITATION 7SS 8FD FR3 P64 RC3 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-18971b9d746a2e3cd1c5a57bbca2673d103b2e46eea1672b5b9df92de86509423 |
ISSN | 0737-4038 |
IngestDate | Wed Dec 04 15:48:56 EST 2024 Wed Dec 04 09:59:04 EST 2024 Thu Nov 21 23:45:19 EST 2024 Wed Oct 16 00:57:54 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 12 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c472t-18971b9d746a2e3cd1c5a57bbca2673d103b2e46eea1672b5b9df92de86509423 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
OpenAccessLink | https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article-pdf/15/12/1620/11168313/mbev_15_12_1620.pdf |
PMID | 9866198 |
PQID | 17168552 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 17 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_69098195 proquest_miscellaneous_17168552 crossref_primary_10_1093_oxfordjournals_molbev_a025890 pubmed_primary_9866198 |
PublicationCentury | 1900 |
PublicationDate | 1998-12-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1998-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 1998 text: 1998-12-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 1990 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Molecular biology and evolution |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Mol Biol Evol |
PublicationYear | 1998 |
SSID | ssj0014466 |
Score | 1.9258534 |
Snippet | Interspecific comparisons of microsatellite loci have repeatedly shown that the loci are longer and more variable in the species from which they are derived... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 1620 |
SubjectTerms | Animals Base Sequence Chromosome Mapping DNA Primers Drosophila - genetics Drosophila melanogaster Drosophila melanogaster - genetics Drosophila simulans Genetic Markers Genetic Variation Genomic Library Heterozygote Microsatellite Repeats Models, Genetic Models, Statistical Polymerase Chain Reaction Regression Analysis |
Title | Microsatellite variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: a reciprocal test of the ascertainment bias hypothesis |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9866198 https://search.proquest.com/docview/17168552 https://search.proquest.com/docview/69098195 |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb5wwELbaVK16ifqKuk0fPrSnFVswYHBvUZsoarOpKu1Ke0M2mARpA2mAldJr_3jHGGNWSvq6oJVh1yu-j_GY-WYGobc05FFAJXV8LnLYoMSZE4eZcGQec1-SVEV-lNrilB4vg8-rcGXf6XbZJY2YpT9uzCv5H1RhDHBVWbL_gOzwozAAnwFfOALCcPwrjOdKTVfzrqhmI6cb2PdyI178dNV1KCi6LtFrXlZnXNVE0NJje64uLtq1cqa7pGdV6kItaUqBDsuFERDwOh0pB0TB6-n59aXK3aqLeuzezk2z3em4uJPc9HfBcqjp-4GM-xmn521nd-ZWhXzwveWZzsQxGuRsSNmzag9tyCI_AhroKi6D1Q3H7CIjG-pR4o7WY3AY6Y22XtfBqrq8yh6UenZRrYXczDi4cjFz7SJnAvunX5Oj5clJsjhcLe6ie6p8ouq48OWbjT2ZCLf51w_Qu36697-dbNuzuWW70rkti0dot99v4ANNnsfojiyfoPu6A-n1U_Rzm0J4oBAuSmxpgscUwoDp-Jyh0AfMsSUQVgTCVY6BJXiLQFgRCFsCPUPLo8PFx2On78vhpEFEGseLWeQJlsFDzon008xLQx5GQqSc0MjPPNcXRIIFkNyjEREhXJszksm4K9dI_D20U1alfI5wGmTMS8Grh01eEEVUcJa5EgYk83LPDSaImnuaXOryK4mWTfjJNhiJBiPpwZigNwaBBAymioLxUlZtnaj6UHEYktuvoMxlKrw8QXsaumFqFoM7y-IXf_zqPnpon4SXaKe5auUr8F4b8boj2y9u3qg2 |
link.rule.ids | 314,780,784,27924,27925 |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microsatellite+variation+in+Drosophila+melanogaster+and+Drosophila+simulans%3A+a+reciprocal+test+of+the+ascertainment+bias+hypothesis&rft.jtitle=Molecular+biology+and+evolution&rft.au=Hutter%2C+C+M&rft.au=Schug%2C+M+D&rft.au=Aquadro%2C+C+F&rft.date=1998-12-01&rft.issn=0737-4038&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1620&rft.epage=1636&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Foxfordjournals.molbev.a025890&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0737-4038&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0737-4038&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0737-4038&client=summon |