The comparison between pains, difficulties in function, and associating factors of patients in subtypes of temporomandibular disorders

summary  The aim of this study was to compare the multidimensional properties among subtypes of painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD): myofascial pain (group I), disc displacement (group II), arthralgia (group IIIa) and osteoarthritis (group IIIb). A total of 511 patients answered a battery of q...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of oral rehabilitation Vol. 32; no. 5; pp. 315 - 325
Main Authors KINO, K., SUGISAKI, M., HAKETA, T., AMEMORI, Y., ISHIKAWA, T., SHIBUYA, T., SATO, F., AMAGASA, T., TANABE, H., YODA, T., SAKAMOTO, I., OMURA, K., MIYAOKA, H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.05.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:summary  The aim of this study was to compare the multidimensional properties among subtypes of painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD): myofascial pain (group I), disc displacement (group II), arthralgia (group IIIa) and osteoarthritis (group IIIb). A total of 511 patients answered a battery of questionnaires, which included questions relating to intensity and duration of pain, the Japanese version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire, limitation of daily functions, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire short‐form and 34 items of behavioural contributing factors. Group IIIb showed significantly the highest age in all subtypes. Those in group I had higher depression scores than those in group II (P=0·005). Group IIIa had a lower women's ratio than in group II (P=0·001) and the patients showed a shorter pain duration than those in groups I (P=0·000) and II (P=0·001). Group IIIa patients also showed lower visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings for pain descriptors ‘heavy’ (P=0·002) and ‘tiring’ (P=0·004) than those of group I, and ‘dull’ (P=0·005), ‘heavy’ (P=0·001) and ‘tiring’ (P=0·005) than those of group II. Group IIIa showed lower ratios of contributing factors of ‘an awareness of grinding/clenching during sleep’ (P=0·000) and ‘an awareness of clenching sensation when waking up at night’ (P=0·002) than those of group I, and also showed a higher ratio of ‘a liking for a hard food’ (P=0·000) and lower ratio of ‘talking for a long time on the telephone’ (P=0·001) than those of group II. In conclusion, although several properties were different between subtypes, the majority of them were similar in the four subtypes of TMD.
Bibliography:istex:E1D41DC72B49FC24F1F89BA55FCD94E4C8C2D852
ArticleID:JOOR1439
ark:/67375/WNG-Q2MDXFJ2-T
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0305-182X
1365-2842
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01439.x