Super-motifs and evolution of tandem leucine-rich repeats within the small proteoglycans-biglycan, decorin, lumican, fibromodulin, PRELP, keratocan, osteoadherin, epiphycan, and osteoglycin
Leucine‐rich repeats (LRRs) with 20–30 amino acids in unit length are present in many proteins from prokaryotes to eukaryotes. The LRR‐containing proteins include a family of nine small proteoglycans, forming three distinct subfamilies: class I contains biglycan/PG‐I and decorin/PG‐II; class II: lum...
Saved in:
Published in | Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 210 - 225 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.02.2000
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Leucine‐rich repeats (LRRs) with 20–30 amino acids in unit length are present in many proteins from prokaryotes to eukaryotes. The LRR‐containing proteins include a family of nine small proteoglycans, forming three distinct subfamilies: class I contains biglycan/PG‐I and decorin/PG‐II; class II: lumican, fibromodulin, PRELP, keratocan, and osteoadherin; and class III: epiphycan/PG‐Lb and osteoglycin or osteoinductive factor. Comparative sequence analysis of the 34 available protein sequences reveals that these proteoglycans have two types of LRRs, which we call S and T. The type S LRR is 21 residues long and has the consensus sequence of xxaPzxLPxxLxxLxLxxNxI. The type T LRR has 26 residues; its consensus sequence is zzxxaxxxxFxxaxxLxxLxLxxNxL. In both “x” indicates variable residue; “z” is frequently a gap; “a” is Val, Leu, or Ile; and I is Ile or Leu. These type S and T LRRs are ordered into two super‐motifs—STT with about 73 residues in classes I and II and ST with about 47 residues in class III. The 12 LRRs in the small proteoglycans of I and II are best represented as (STT)4; the seven LRRs of class III as (ST)T(ST)2. Our analyses indicate that classes I/II and III evolved along different paths after the establishment of the precursor ST, and classes I and II also diverged after the establishment of the precursor (STT)4. Proteins 2000;38:210–225. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan ark:/67375/WNG-Z8NL1NZ6-W Suhara Foundation istex:6AF1BD2CB8A6821EDCE83D81E27F8B8EB93E6C34 ArticleID:PROT9 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0887-3585 1097-0134 |
DOI: | 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000201)38:2<210::AID-PROT9>3.0.CO;2-1 |