Value of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Perforated Appendicitis

• Published in: World journal of surgery Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 93 - 97
• Main Authors: Fukami, Yasuyuki, Hasegawa, Hiroshi, Sakamoto, Eiji, Komatsu, Shunichiro, Hiromatsu, Takashi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer‐Verlag 01.01.2007; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abscess - epidemiology; Adult; Aged; Appendectomy - adverse effects; Appendectomy - methods; Appendicitis; Appendicitis - complications; Appendicitis - surgery; Biological and medical sciences; Complicated Appendicitis; Digestive system. Abdomen; Drainage - methods; Endoscopy; Female; General aspects; Humans; Intestinal Perforation - etiology; Intestinal Perforation - surgery; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Laparoscopic Appendectomy; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Open Appendectomy; Perforated Appendicitis; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology; Treatment Outcome; Medicine; Appendectomy; Treatment; Vermiform appendix; Appendicitis; Surgery; Digestive diseases; Intestinal disease; Laparoscopy; Endoscopy
• ISSN: 0364-2313; 1432-2323
• DOI: 10.1007/s00268-006-0065-x

Background The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with perforated appendicitis. Methods This study involved a total of 73 consecutive patients who had undergone appendectomy for perforated appendicitis between January 1999 and December 2004. While 39 patients underwent open appendectomy (OA) during the first 3 years, the remaining 34 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) during the last 3 years. Results There was no case of LA converted to OA. No significant difference was found in the operating time between the two groups. Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with less analgesic use, earlier oral intake restart (LA, 2.6 days; OA, 5.1 days), shorter median hospital stay (LA, 11.7 days; OA, 25.8 days), and lower rate of wound infections (LA, 8.8%; OA, 43.6%). Conclusions These results suggest that LA for perforated appendicitis is a safe procedure that may prove to have significant clinical advantages over conventional surgery.