Definitional and Responsive Environmental Meanings: A Meadian Look at Landscapes and Drought
Current conceptual frameworks differ deeply on the meanings of human‐natural environment relations. One is a monist social constructionist frame: meaning is only in human definitions, and natural events are meaningless. The other offers dualist perspectives that locate meaning both in definitions an...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal for the theory of social behaviour Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 65 - 91 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK and Boston, USA
Blackwell Publishers Ltd
01.03.1997
Blackwell B. Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Current conceptual frameworks differ deeply on the meanings of human‐natural environment relations. One is a monist social constructionist frame: meaning is only in human definitions, and natural events are meaningless. The other offers dualist perspectives that locate meaning both in definitions and in realist indications of environmental events such as global environmental change. After discussing ‘landscape’ as a bridging concept, I suggest an ordering of the two perspectives through a metatheoretical distinction between definitional and responsive meanings with primacy in the response. Finally, I apply a metatheoretical schema based on the work of George H. Mead to meanings of natural environment implicated in a discussion of an official pronouncement, ‘The drought is over’. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:7BE2EAC9DF2199B4D566220E4E6B72F2B71192B1 ark:/67375/WNG-D125THP6-Q ArticleID:JTSB026 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0021-8308 1468-5914 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1468-5914.00026 |