Definitional and Responsive Environmental Meanings: A Meadian Look at Landscapes and Drought

Current conceptual frameworks differ deeply on the meanings of human‐natural environment relations. One is a monist social constructionist frame: meaning is only in human definitions, and natural events are meaningless. The other offers dualist perspectives that locate meaning both in definitions an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal for the theory of social behaviour Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 65 - 91
Main Author Weigert, Andrew J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 01.03.1997
Blackwell
B. Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Current conceptual frameworks differ deeply on the meanings of human‐natural environment relations. One is a monist social constructionist frame: meaning is only in human definitions, and natural events are meaningless. The other offers dualist perspectives that locate meaning both in definitions and in realist indications of environmental events such as global environmental change. After discussing ‘landscape’ as a bridging concept, I suggest an ordering of the two perspectives through a metatheoretical distinction between definitional and responsive meanings with primacy in the response. Finally, I apply a metatheoretical schema based on the work of George H. Mead to meanings of natural environment implicated in a discussion of an official pronouncement, ‘The drought is over’.
Bibliography:istex:7BE2EAC9DF2199B4D566220E4E6B72F2B71192B1
ark:/67375/WNG-D125THP6-Q
ArticleID:JTSB026
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0021-8308
1468-5914
DOI:10.1111/1468-5914.00026