Functional near-infrared optical imaging: Utility and limitations in human brain mapping

Although near‐infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was developed as a tool for clinical monitoring of tissue oxygenation, it also has potential for neuroimaging. A wide range of different NIRS instruments have been developed, and instruments for continuous intensity measurements with fixed spacing [continuo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychophysiology Vol. 40; no. 4; pp. 511 - 520
Main Author Hoshi, Yoko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing 01.07.2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although near‐infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was developed as a tool for clinical monitoring of tissue oxygenation, it also has potential for neuroimaging. A wide range of different NIRS instruments have been developed, and instruments for continuous intensity measurements with fixed spacing [continuous wave (CW)‐type instruments], which are most readily available commercially, allow us to see dynamic changes in regional cerebral blood flow in real time. However, quantification, which is necessary for imaging of brain functions, is impossible with these CW‐type instruments. Over the past 20 years, many different approaches to quantification have been tried, and several multichannel time‐resolved and frequency‐domain instruments are now in common use for imaging. Although there are still many problems with this technique, such as incomplete knowledge of how light propagates through the head, NIRS will not only open a window on brain physiology for subjects who have rarely been examined until now, but also provide a new direction for functional mapping studies.
Bibliography:istex:D66D2CDA119F78A77ED6B65DFE75A4DD2F57FD54
ark:/67375/WNG-ZC4NH2F1-T
ArticleID:PSYP53
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-3
ISSN:0048-5772
1469-8986
DOI:10.1111/1469-8986.00053