Customized Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Adult Cataract in Iran

To customize clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for cataract management in the Iranian population. First, four CPGs (American Academy of Ophthalmology 2006 and 2011, Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2010, and Canadian Ophthalmological Society 2008) were selected from a number of available CPGs in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of ophthalmic & vision research Vol. 10; no. 4; pp. 445 - 460
Main Authors Rajavi, Zhaleh, Javadi, Mohammad Ali, Daftarian, Narsis, Safi, Sare, Nejat, Farhad, Shirvani, Armin, Ahmadieh, Hamid, Shahraz, Saeid, Ziaei, Hossein, Moein, Hamidreza, Motlagh, Behzad Fallahi, Feizi, Sepehr, Foroutan, Alireza, Hashemi, Hassan, Hashemian, Seyed Javad, Jabbarvand, Mahmoud, Jafarinasab, Mohammad Reza, Karimian, Farid, Mohammad-Rabei, Hossein, Mohammadpour, Mehrdad, Nassiri, Nader, Panahi-Bazaz, Mahmoodreza, Rohani, Mohammad Reza, Sedaghat, Mohammad Reza, Sheibani, Kourosh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Iran Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd 01.10.2015
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
Knowledge E
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To customize clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for cataract management in the Iranian population. First, four CPGs (American Academy of Ophthalmology 2006 and 2011, Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2010, and Canadian Ophthalmological Society 2008) were selected from a number of available CPGs in the literature for cataract management. All recommendations of these guidelines, together with their references, were studied. Each recommendation was summarized in 4 tables. The first table showed the recommendation itself in clinical question components format along with its level of evidence. The second table contained structured abstracts of supporting articles related to the clinical question with their levels of evidence. The third table included the customized recommendation of the internal group respecting its clinical advantage, cost, and complications. In the fourth table, the internal group their recommendations from 1 to 9 based on the customizing capability of the recommendation (applicability, acceptability, external validity). Finally, customized recommendations were sent one month prior to a consensus session to faculty members of all universities across the country asking for their comments on recommendations. The agreed recommendations were accepted as conclusive while those with no agreement were discussed at the consensus session. Finally, all customized recommendations were codified as 80 recommendations along with their sources and levels of evidence for the Iranian population. Customization of CPGs for management of adult cataract for the Iranian population seems to be useful for standardization of referral, diagnosis and treatment of patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2008-2010
2008-322X
2008-322X
DOI:10.4103/2008-322X.176913