Dry Needling with the Use of FRSc Technique in Addition to Standard Rehabilitation Program for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Both PROMs and Measurement Tools

• Published in: Journal of pain research Vol. 17; pp. 1041 - 1053
• Main Authors: Rajfur, Joanna, Rajfur, Katarzyna, Matusz, Tomasz, Malarska, Maria, Walewicz, Karolina, Ptaszkowski, Kuba, Dymarek, Robert, Taradaj, Jakub
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 31.03.2024; Dove; Dove Medical Press
• Subjects: Backache; Care and treatment; Clinical Trial Report; dry needling; gait analysis; Health aspects; low back pain; Measurement; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Methods; Pain; postural control; Proms (Parties); rehabilitation; Poland; postural control; rehabilitation; dry needling; low back pain; gait analysis
• ISSN: 1178-7090; 1178-7090
• DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S450119

Dry needling (DN) has gained popularity for musculoskeletal conditions, but its commercial use often surpasses scientific evidence. The novel Five Regulatory Systems Concept (FRSc) of DN shows potential therapeutic mechanisms, including chronic low back pain (LBP). However, rigorous clinical assessment with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective measures are necessary. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of DN according to pain levels, postural control and selected gait parameters in patients with chronic LBP. This prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study involved 30 patients with LBP allocated in the experimental (n=15, rehabilitation+ FRSc DN) or control group (n=15, rehabilitation + sham DN). The Roland-Morris questionnaire (RMQ) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used as PROMs. Moreover, the posturography method for posture and balance control and the treadmill for gait analysis were used as objective tools. Measurements were taken before and immediately after the intervention and during 1- and 3-month follow up. There was a statistically significantly greater improvement in the RMQ in the experimental group compared to the controls (p=0.923 before and p<0.001 after treatment, as well as p<0.001 after 1 and 3 months). Despite the favorable analgesic effect, a significant advantage of the experimental group over the controls in this respect is worth noting (p=0.001 in favor of DN in all intergroup comparisons concerning results from the subjective assessment of pain (VAS). A statistically insignificant post-treatment improvement in balance and postural stability was noted in both groups, although the effects appeared to be short-term. Surprisingly, again, DN had no advantage over sham interventions. In both groups, all changes in the swing phase were statistically insignificant (p=0.201 for the dominant and p=0.283 for the non-dominant side) for the initial swing phase. In both groups, all changes in the stance phase were statistically insignificant (p=0.480 for the dominant and p=0.410 for the non-dominant side of the body). DN based on the FRSc appears promising as an effective adjunct to standard rehabilitation for LBP, showing improvements in functional performance and pain reduction.