Prevalence of Asherman's syndrome after secondary removal of placental remnants or a repeat curettage for incomplete abortion

This prospective study assesses the prevalence of intrauterine adhesions among women undergoing secondary removal of placental remnants after delivery, or a repeat curettage for incomplete abortions, and evaluates risk factors associated with the presence of intrauterine adhesions. In 50 women, unde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman reproduction (Oxford) Vol. 13; no. 12; pp. 3347 - 3350
Main Authors Westendorp, I C, Ankum, W M, Mol, B W, Vonk, J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.12.1998
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This prospective study assesses the prevalence of intrauterine adhesions among women undergoing secondary removal of placental remnants after delivery, or a repeat curettage for incomplete abortions, and evaluates risk factors associated with the presence of intrauterine adhesions. In 50 women, undergoing either a secondary removal of placental remnants more than 24 h after delivery, or a repeat curettage for incomplete abortions, ambulatory hysteroscopy was performed 3 months after the intervention. Intrauterine adhesions were found in 20 of the women (40%): five patients had Asherman's syndrome grade I, six had grade II, six had grade III and three had grade IV. In women with menstrual disorders a statistically significant 12-fold increased risk for Asherman's syndrome grade II-IV was found. Previous abortion as well as infection during surgery were associated with a mildly but non-significant increased risk. Based on our findings, hysteroscopy is recommended only in those patients who develop menstrual disorders, either after secondary intervention for placental remnants after delivery or after a repeat curettage.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.12.3347