A collaborative study of an alternative in vitro potency assay for the Japanese encephalitis vaccine

•We developed an alternative in vitro ELISA to determine the E antigen content of the Japanese encephalitis virus to observe the 3Rs strategy.•Our study demonstrated that an in vitro assay could perform faster and was more convenient than the established in vivo PRNTest for JEV vaccine.•Thus, we pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVirus research Vol. 223; pp. 190 - 196
Main Authors Kim, Byung-Chul, Kim, Do-Keun, Kim, Hyung-Jin, Hong, Seung-Hwa, Kim, Yeonhee, Lim, Jong-Mi, Hong, JiYoung, Kim, Cheol-Hee, Park, Yong-Keun, Kim, Jaeok
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 02.09.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•We developed an alternative in vitro ELISA to determine the E antigen content of the Japanese encephalitis virus to observe the 3Rs strategy.•Our study demonstrated that an in vitro assay could perform faster and was more convenient than the established in vivo PRNTest for JEV vaccine.•Thus, we propose a progressive switch from the in vivo assay to the in vitro ELISA for JEV vaccine quality control. The use of inactivated Japanese encephalitis (JE) vaccines has been ongoing in East Asia for 40 years. A mouse immunogenicity assay followed by a Plaque Reduction Neutralization (PRN) Test (PRNTest) is currently recommended for each lot release of the vaccine by many national authorities. We developed an alternative in vitro ELISA to determine the E antigen content of the Japanese encephalitis virus to observe the 3Rs strategy. A collaborative study for replacing the in vivo potency assay for the Japanese encephalitis vaccine with the in vitro ELISA assay was confirmed comparability between these two methods. The study demonstrated that an in vitro assay could perform faster and was more convenient than the established in vivo PRNTest. Moreover, this assay had better precision and reproducibility compared with the conventional in vivo assay. Additionally, the content of antigen determined using the in vitro ELISA correlated well with the potency of the in vivo assay. Furthermore, this method allowed discrimination between individual lots. Thus, we propose a progressive switch from the in vivo assay to the in vitro ELISA for JE vaccine quality control.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0168-1702
1872-7492
DOI:10.1016/j.virusres.2016.07.012