Treaty Interpretation or Activism? Comment on the AB Report on United States – ADs and CVDs on Certain Products from China

This comment is limited to the 'public body' issue and the question of so-called 'double remedies'. It ends with a few tentative explanations as to why the Appellate Body in this dispute opted for a rather restrictive interpretation or, depending on one's viewpoint, activist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld trade review Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 235 - 241
Main Author PAUWELYN, JOOST
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.04.2013
Subjects
Agreements
Antidumping duties
Subsidies
Treaties
World Trade Organization. Appellate Body
UNITED STATES
CHINA
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This comment is limited to the 'public body' issue and the question of so-called 'double remedies'. It ends with a few tentative explanations as to why the Appellate Body in this dispute opted for a rather restrictive interpretation or, depending on one's viewpoint, activist approach as compared to the Panel in the same case.
Bibliography:WORLD TRADE REVIEW, Vol. 12, No. 2, Apr 2013, 235-241
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
ISSN:1474-7456
1475-3138
DOI:10.1017/S1474745612000596