Understanding differences in family engagement and provider outreach in New Journeys: A coordinated specialty care program for first episode psychosis

•70% of family members attended at least one family psychoeducation appointment across 24-months of coordinated specialty care treatment.•40% of family members attended the first month of family psychoeducation.•Clinicians made a significantly higher number of outreach efforts and scheduled a signif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychiatry research Vol. 291; p. 113286
Main Authors Oluwoye, Oladunni, Stokes, Bryony, Stiles, Bryan, Monroe-DeVita, Maria, McDonell, Michael G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.09.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•70% of family members attended at least one family psychoeducation appointment across 24-months of coordinated specialty care treatment.•40% of family members attended the first month of family psychoeducation.•Clinicians made a significantly higher number of outreach efforts and scheduled a significantly lower number of family psychoeducation appointments for black families compared to white families.•Families with no insurance or public insurance attended a significantly lower number of family psychoeducation appointments compared to those with private insurance. The present study examined clinician outreach efforts to families and family engagement; and predictors of engagement in a coordinated specialty care (CSC) for first episode psychosis. From 2015 to 2019, 211 clients experiencing their first episode of psychosis and their family members received services from New Journeys, a network of CSC programs in the United States. Analyses examined the association between race/ethnicity, insurance type, referral source, housing stability, and outreach efforts and family attendance. Overall, 70% of client family members attended at least one psychoeducation appointment and in the first month of treatment 40% of family members attended family psychoeducation. Outreach efforts including phone attempts (β=1.09; p = 0.02) and phone contact (β=1.10; p = 0.02) were significantly higher for Black families relative to White families; whereas Black families were scheduled less often for a family psychoeducation (β=-0.28; p = 0.02) compared to Whites families. Significant differences in family attendance based on insurance type were also found (p<0.01). Referral source and housing stability were not significant predictors of outreach or attendance. These findings suggest that alternative engagement efforts that extend beyond in-person contact may be needed to continuously engage families, specifically Black families and those with public and no insurance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0165-1781
1872-7123
1872-7123
DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113286