Understanding differences in family engagement and provider outreach in New Journeys: A coordinated specialty care program for first episode psychosis
•70% of family members attended at least one family psychoeducation appointment across 24-months of coordinated specialty care treatment.•40% of family members attended the first month of family psychoeducation.•Clinicians made a significantly higher number of outreach efforts and scheduled a signif...
Saved in:
Published in | Psychiatry research Vol. 291; p. 113286 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Ireland
Elsevier B.V
01.09.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •70% of family members attended at least one family psychoeducation appointment across 24-months of coordinated specialty care treatment.•40% of family members attended the first month of family psychoeducation.•Clinicians made a significantly higher number of outreach efforts and scheduled a significantly lower number of family psychoeducation appointments for black families compared to white families.•Families with no insurance or public insurance attended a significantly lower number of family psychoeducation appointments compared to those with private insurance.
The present study examined clinician outreach efforts to families and family engagement; and predictors of engagement in a coordinated specialty care (CSC) for first episode psychosis. From 2015 to 2019, 211 clients experiencing their first episode of psychosis and their family members received services from New Journeys, a network of CSC programs in the United States. Analyses examined the association between race/ethnicity, insurance type, referral source, housing stability, and outreach efforts and family attendance. Overall, 70% of client family members attended at least one psychoeducation appointment and in the first month of treatment 40% of family members attended family psychoeducation. Outreach efforts including phone attempts (β=1.09; p = 0.02) and phone contact (β=1.10; p = 0.02) were significantly higher for Black families relative to White families; whereas Black families were scheduled less often for a family psychoeducation (β=-0.28; p = 0.02) compared to Whites families. Significant differences in family attendance based on insurance type were also found (p<0.01). Referral source and housing stability were not significant predictors of outreach or attendance. These findings suggest that alternative engagement efforts that extend beyond in-person contact may be needed to continuously engage families, specifically Black families and those with public and no insurance. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0165-1781 1872-7123 1872-7123 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113286 |