Long-term follow-up of small (size 20 and 21) medtronic-hall aortic valve prostheses
Our goal was to study the long-term follow-up of patients having aortic valve replacement and to focus particularly on the patients receiving small prostheses. Four hundred twenty-eight Medtronic-Hall valves were implanted (156 size 20 or 21 mm, 149 size 22 or 23 mm, and 123 size 25 or 27 mm). Group...
Saved in:
Published in | The Annals of thoracic surgery Vol. 64; no. 2; pp. 421 - 425 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.08.1997
Elsevier Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Our goal was to study the long-term follow-up of patients having aortic valve replacement and to focus particularly on the patients receiving small prostheses.
Four hundred twenty-eight Medtronic-Hall valves were implanted (156 size 20 or 21 mm, 149 size 22 or 23 mm, and 123 size 25 or 27 mm). Group 20–21 had a higher number of female patients, more associated coronary lesions, and more patients with aortic stenosis.
The actuarial survival rate at 8 years was 80% for group 20–21, 80% for group 22–23, and 76% for group 25–27 (p = not significant). In group 20–21, the actuarial event-free rates at 8 years were as follows: thromboembolic complications, 94%; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 99%; reoperation, 98%; and hemorrhagic complications, 78%. The only factors of prognostic value in this group were age and associated coronary lesions.
The durable nature of the results obtained with the Medtronic-Hall 20- and 21-mm prostheses compared with large-diameter prostheses allows the use of a simple and reliable surgical technique and should mean that indications for ring enlargement become rare. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0003-4975 1552-6259 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00443-8 |