The golden rule of forecasting: Objections, refinements, and enhancements
In providing a “golden rule” for forecasting, Armstrong, Green, and Graefe (this issue) raise aspirations that reliable forecasting is possible. They advocate a conservative approach that mainly involves extrapolating from the present. We comment on three issues that relate to their proposed Golden...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of business research Vol. 68; no. 8; pp. 1702 - 1704 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Elsevier Inc
01.08.2015
Elsevier Sequoia S.A |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In providing a “golden rule” for forecasting, Armstrong, Green, and Graefe (this issue) raise aspirations that reliable forecasting is possible. They advocate a conservative approach that mainly involves extrapolating from the present. We comment on three issues that relate to their proposed Golden Rule: its scope of application, the importance of highly improbable events, and the challenges of communicating forecasts. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0148-2963 1873-7978 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.029 |