Molecular characterization of long-term impacts of macrophytes harvest management in constructed wetlands
[Display omitted] •We clarify the true benefits of plants harvest management in CWs using long-term data.•Continuous harvesting notably increases P. australis biomass and nutrients uptake.•Plant harvesting enhances microbial community diversity and richness in CWs notably. There is little understand...
Saved in:
Published in | Bioresource technology Vol. 268; pp. 514 - 522 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.11.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | [Display omitted]
•We clarify the true benefits of plants harvest management in CWs using long-term data.•Continuous harvesting notably increases P. australis biomass and nutrients uptake.•Plant harvesting enhances microbial community diversity and richness in CWs notably.
There is little understanding of constructed wetlands (CWs) microbial community patterns in response to harvest management. Therefore, long-term impacts of harvesting Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel annually in November on the activity and community structure of microorganisms critical to the treatment efficiency of CW are elucidated. Findings show exponential increases in P. australis density and biomass with continuous harvesting, up to three times over unharvested CW. High-throughput pyrosequencing analysis demonstrates that plants harvesting improves the microbial community diversity and richness significantly, and more particularly, the relative abundance of Flavobacterium, Paenisporosarcina, and Povalibacter, which are extensively associated with CW performance. Consequently, increased plants biomass resulted in enhanced plants nutrients uptake in harvested (56.5 g N/m2, 5.5 g P/m2) than unharvested CWs (17.5 g N/m2, 1.8 g P/m2), whereas improved rhizosphere microclimates significantly enhanced nutrients removals in harvested CW (TN 109.9 g/m2 vs 67.4 g/m2, TP 18.0 g/m2 vs 13.0 g/m2). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.030 |