Route infrastructure and the risk of injuries to bicyclists: a case-crossover study

We compared cycling injury risks of 14 route types and other route infrastructure features. We recruited 690 city residents injured while cycling in Toronto or Vancouver, Canada. A case-crossover design compared route infrastructure at each injury site to that of a randomly selected control site fro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of public health (1971) Vol. 102; no. 12; pp. 2336 - 2343
Main Authors Teschke, Kay, Harris, M Anne, Reynolds, Conor C O, Winters, Meghan, Babul, Shelina, Chipman, Mary, Cusimano, Michael D, Brubacher, Jeff R, Hunte, Garth, Friedman, Steven M, Monro, Melody, Shen, Hui, Vernich, Lee, Cripton, Peter A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Public Health Association 01.12.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We compared cycling injury risks of 14 route types and other route infrastructure features. We recruited 690 city residents injured while cycling in Toronto or Vancouver, Canada. A case-crossover design compared route infrastructure at each injury site to that of a randomly selected control site from the same trip. Of 14 route types, cycle tracks had the lowest risk (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.02, 0.54), about one ninth the risk of the reference: major streets with parked cars and no bike infrastructure. Risks on major streets were lower without parked cars (adjusted OR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.41, 0.96) and with bike lanes (adjusted OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.29, 1.01). Local streets also had lower risks (adjusted OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.31, 0.84). Other infrastructure characteristics were associated with increased risks: streetcar or train tracks (adjusted OR = 3.0; 95% CI = 1.8, 5.1), downhill grades (adjusted OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.7, 3.1), and construction (adjusted OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.3, 2.9). The lower risks on quiet streets and with bike-specific infrastructure along busy streets support the route-design approach used in many northern European countries. Transportation infrastructure with lower bicycling injury risks merits public health support to reduce injuries and promote cycling.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Peer Reviewed
Contributors
K. Teschke wrote the first draft of the article. K. Teschke, M. A. Harris, C. C. O. Reynolds, P. A. Cripton, M. Winters, S. Babul, M. Chipman, M. D. Cusimano, J. R. Brubacher, G. Hunte, and S. M. Friedman designed and obtained funding for the study. M. Monro and L. Vernich coordinated the study conduct and contributed to the design and testing of study instruments. H. Shen conducted the data analyses. All authors contributed to interpreting the results and writing the article.
ISSN:0090-0036
1541-0048
DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300762