‘Normal’ semantic–phonemic fluency discrepancy in Alzheimer's disease? A meta-analytic study

In a meta-analysis of 135 studies involving 6000 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 6057 healthy controls, we examined the relative degree of semantic and phonemic fluency impairment in AD patients. The effect size for semantic fluency ( d = 2.10: 95%CI 2.22–1.97) was significantly larg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCortex Vol. 46; no. 5; pp. 595 - 601
Main Authors Laws, Keith R., Duncan, Amy, Gale, Tim M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Italy Elsevier Srl 01.05.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In a meta-analysis of 135 studies involving 6000 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 6057 healthy controls, we examined the relative degree of semantic and phonemic fluency impairment in AD patients. The effect size for semantic fluency ( d = 2.10: 95%CI 2.22–1.97) was significantly larger than for both phonemic fluency ( d = 1.46: 95%CI 1.56–1.36) and picture naming ( d = 1.54: 95%CI 1.66–1.40). In meta-regression analyses we found that studies with greater proportions of female patients and less severe dementia both led to better phonemic fluency; while perhaps surprisingly, increased patient education led to worse semantic fluency. Critically, in 50 studies measuring both semantic and phonemic fluency, the effect size for the semantic–phonemic discrepancy scores did not differ between AD patients and controls; and was unrelated to any of the moderator variables. The latter findings indicate that the semantic–phonemic fluency discrepancy measure often reported as an important distinguishing characteristic of AD patients may be an exaggerated normal tendency.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0010-9452
1973-8102
DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.04.009