The Effect of Foot Strike Pattern on Achilles Tendon Load During Running

In this study we compared Achilles tendon loading parameters during barefoot running among females with different foot strike patterns using open-source computer muscle modeling software to provide dynamic simulations of running. Muscle forces of the gastrocnemius and soleus were estimated from expe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of biomedical engineering Vol. 41; no. 8; pp. 1758 - 1766
Main Authors Almonroeder, Thomas, Willson, John D., Kernozek, Thomas W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Springer US 01.08.2013
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this study we compared Achilles tendon loading parameters during barefoot running among females with different foot strike patterns using open-source computer muscle modeling software to provide dynamic simulations of running. Muscle forces of the gastrocnemius and soleus were estimated from experimental data collected in a motion capture laboratory during barefoot running for 11 runners utilizing a rearfoot strike (RFS) and 8 runners utilizing a non-RFS (NRFS) pattern. Our results show that peak Achilles tendon force occurred earlier in stance phase ( p  = 0.007), which contributed to a 15% increase in average Achilles tendon loading rate among participants adopting a NRFS pattern ( p  = 0.06). Stance time, step length, and the estimated number of steps per mile were similar between groups. However, runners with a NRFS pattern experienced 11% greater Achilles tendon impulse each step ( p  = 0.05) and nearly significantly greater Achilles tendon impulse per mile run ( p  = 0.06). This difference equates to an additional 47.7 body weights for each mile run with a NRFS pattern. Runners considering a NRFS pattern may want to account for these novel stressors and adapt training programs accordingly.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0090-6964
1573-9686
DOI:10.1007/s10439-013-0819-1