Effect of meal composition on postprandial glucagon-like peptide-1, insulin, glucagon, C-peptide, and glucose responses in overweight/obese subjects

• Published in: European journal of nutrition Vol. 56; no. 3; pp. 1053 - 1062
• Main Authors: Shah, Meena, Franklin, Brian, Adams-Huet, Beverley, Mitchell, Joel, Bouza, Brooke, Dart, Lyn, Phillips, Melody
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.04.2017; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Appetite; Blood Glucose - metabolism; Body Mass Index; C-Peptide - blood; Chemistry; Chemistry and Materials Science; Cross-Over Studies; Exercise; Female; Glucagon - blood; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 - blood; Humans; Insulin - blood; Insulin Resistance; Male; Meals; Mental Recall; Middle Aged; Nutrition; Obesity - blood; Original Contribution; Overweight - blood; Postprandial Period; Young Adult; High-monounsaturated fat meal; Obesity; Meal composition; Glucagon-like peptide-1; High-protein meal; Insulin
• ISSN: 1436-6207; 1436-6215
• DOI: 10.1007/s00394-016-1154-8

Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), an incretin hormone, is released in response to food intake. It is unclear how meals high in protein (HP) and monounsaturated fat (HMF) affect GLP-1 response. Purpose To examine the effect of a HP versus a HMF meal on GLP-1 response. Methods Twenty-four overweight/obese participants consumed two meals (HP: 31.9 % energy from protein; HMF: 35.2 % fat and 20.7 % monounsaturated fat) in a random order. Both meals contained the same energy and carbohydrate content. GLP-1, insulin, glucagon, C-peptide, and glucose were assessed from blood drawn in the fasting and postprandial states. The effect of meal condition on hormone and glucose responses and appetite ratings were assessed by repeated measures analysis. Results Statistically significant ( p  < 0.01) time by meal condition effect was observed on active GLP-1, total GLP-1, insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon, but not glucose ( p  = 0.83). Area under the curve was significantly higher during the HP versus the HMF meal conditions for active GLP-1 (23.7 %; p  = 0.0007), total GLP-1 (12.2 %; p  < 0.0001), insulin (54.4 %; p  < 0.0001), C-peptide (14.8 %; p  < 0.0001), and glucagon (40.7 %; p  < 0.0001). Blood glucose was not different between the HP versus HMF conditions (−4.8 %; p  = 0.11). Insulin sensitivity was higher during the HMF versus HP conditions (Matsuda index mean difference: 16.3 %; p  = 0.007). Appetite ratings were not different by meal condition. Conclusions GLP-1 and insulin responses were higher during the HP condition. However, no difference was found in blood glucose between conditions, and insulin sensitivity was higher during the HMF condition, indicating that a HMF meal may be optimal at regulating blood glucose in overweight/obese individuals without type 2 diabetes.