Global evaluation of the use of glycaemic impact measurements to food or nutrient intake

• Published in: Public health nutrition Vol. 24; no. 12; pp. 3966 - 3975
• Main Author: Trumbo, Paula R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.08.2021
• Subjects: Approximation; Carbohydrates; Descriptive labeling; Diabetes; Diabetes mellitus; Food; Food intake; Food labeling; Gestational diabetes; Glucose; Glucose tolerance; Glycemic index; Government agencies; Insulin; Labeling; Physiology; Plasma; Public health; Public Policies; Review; Websites; Glycaemic impact; Oral glucose tolerance test; Glycaemic index; Post-prandial glucose
• ISSN: 1368-9800; 1475-2727
• DOI: 10.1017/S1368980021000616

Measures of glycaemic impact (e.g. postprandial glucose (PPG), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and glycaemic index (GI)) are used by government health and regulatory agencies and public health associations around the world. The objective of this global review was to identify similarities and differences in the use of glycaemic impact measures for potential considerations for harmonisation. A literature and internet search was conducted to identify country government agencies and health associations that provide guidance or recommendations for PPG, OGTT, GI and glycaemic load. Based on this global review, the use of GI for food labelling (e.g. low GI) is limited and its use is voluntary. The application of OGTT as a diagnostic measurement of diabetes and gestational diabetes is widely used and in a consistent manner among the different regions of the world. Time-specific (e.g. 2 h) PPG is commonly used as a target not to exceed in individuals with diabetes and gestational diabetes. PPG is used by regulatory agencies for the substantiation of food labelling. There are differences, however, among regulatory agencies in the specific measure of PPG (i.e. PPG AUC v. peak PPG). Maximum targets for 2-h PPG for individuals with diabetes and gestational diabetes, ranging between 6 and 10 mmol/l, across countries suggest a potential consideration to harmonise PPG targets. There is general consistency in the use and/or target levels of glycaemic impact measures; however, there is a potential need to investigate harmonisation strategies on certain aspects of glycaemic impact measures.