A study of the efficacy of ultrasonic waves in removing biofilms

• Published in: Gerodontology Vol. 27; no. 3; pp. 199 - 206
• Main Authors: Nishikawa, Takeshi, Yoshida, Akihiro, Khanal, Amit, Habu, Manabu, Yoshioka, Izumi, Toyoshima, Kuniaki, Takehara, Tadamichi, Nishihara, Tatsuji, Tachibana, Katsuro, Tominaga, Kazuhiro
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2010
• Subjects: Bacteriological Techniques; biofilm; Biofilms; Coloring Agents; Dental Plaque - microbiology; Dental Plaque - therapy; Dentistry; Ferric Compounds - therapeutic use; Humans; Iron - therapeutic use; Materials Testing; micro bubble; Microbubbles - therapeutic use; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Oxides - therapeutic use; Spectrophotometry; Streptococcus mutans; Streptococcus mutans - physiology; Streptococcus mutans - ultrastructure; Time Factors; Transducers; ultrasonic wave; Ultrasonics - classification
• ISSN: 0734-0664; 1741-2358
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00325.x

doi:10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2009.00325.x 
 A study of the efficacy of ultrasonic waves in removing biofilms Objective:  The removal of adherent biofilms was assessed using ultrasonic waves in a non‐contact mode. Materials and Methods:  In in vitro experiments, Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) biofilms were exposed to ultrasonic waves at various frequencies (280 kHz, 1 MHz, or 2 MHz), duty ratios (0–90%), and exposure times (1–3 minutes), and the optimal conditions for biofilm removal were identified. Furthermore, the effect of adding a contrast medium, such as micro bubbles (Sonazoid®), was examined. The spatial distribution and architecture of S. mutans biofilms before and after ultrasonic wave exposure were examined via scanning electron microscopy. The biofilm removal effect was also examined in in vivo experiments, using a custom‐made oral cleaning device. Results:  When a 280 kHz probe was used, the biofilm‐removing effect increased significantly compared to 1 and 2 MHz probes; more than 80% of the adherent biofilm was removed with a duty cycle of 50–90% and a 3 minutes exposure time. The maximum biofilm‐removing effect was observed with a duty cycle of 80%. Furthermore, the addition of micro bubbles enhanced this biofilm‐removing effect. In in vivo experiments, moderate biofilm removal was observed when a 280 kHz probe was used for 5 minutes. Conclusions:  This study demonstrated that ultrasonic wave exposure in a non‐contact mode effectively removed adherent biofilms composed of S. mutans in vitro.