The pricing and performance of stock index futures spreads

An attempt is made to examine the extent to which intermarket and intramarket stock index futures spreads are priced consistent with the theoretical no-arbitrage conditions. Data consist of the Friday settlement prices for each week for the Chicago Mercantile Exchange's Standard & Poor'...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of futures markets Vol. 8; no. 3; pp. 303 - 318
Main Authors Billingsley, Randall S., Chance, Don M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.06.1988
Published by J. Wiley in affiliation with the Center for the Study of Futures Markets, Columbia University
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:An attempt is made to examine the extent to which intermarket and intramarket stock index futures spreads are priced consistent with the theoretical no-arbitrage conditions. Data consist of the Friday settlement prices for each week for the Chicago Mercantile Exchange's Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 futures contract from April 23, 1982, through January 31, 1986; these contracts are used to test intramarket spread relationships. Intermarket spreads are tested by buying the nearby S&P contract and selling the New York Futures Exchange New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) futures contract, whose Friday settlement prices are collected beginning on May 6, 1982. The results show that, on average, intermarket spreads have been priced correctly from the beginning of trading in 1982 through early 1986. They were, however, significantly underpriced during the first portion of the period and overpriced since that time. Intramarket spreads since September 30, 1983, have been significantly overpriced. However, transaction costs would have absorbed any abnormal profits.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-5Q8ZRPRH-5
ArticleID:FUT3990080305
istex:10D38D197359CF01506E651B3E6128A438A7BEAA
ISSN:0270-7314
1096-9934
DOI:10.1002/fut.3990080305