SURGICAL MARGIN AND ITS INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL IN SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA

Background:  The goal of surgeons treating soft tissue sarcoma is to gain local control, to avoid risk of local recurrence and to avoid compromise of the patient's potential survival. The aim of the investigation was to assess the significance of the extent of surgical margin on the chance of d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inANZ journal of surgery Vol. 76; no. 3; pp. 104 - 109
Main Authors Dickinson, Ian C., Whitwell, Duncan J., Battistuta, Diane, Thompson, Bridie, Strobel, Nichola, Duggal, Amit, Steadman, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Publishing Asia 01.03.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background:  The goal of surgeons treating soft tissue sarcoma is to gain local control, to avoid risk of local recurrence and to avoid compromise of the patient's potential survival. The aim of the investigation was to assess the significance of the extent of surgical margin on the chance of death, metastasis and local recurrence. Methods:  Two hundred and seventy‐nine patients who presented with soft tissue sarcoma without metastatic disease were analysed. Results:  The extent of the surgical margin was not clinically or statistically significant in the development of metastatic disease. The presence of a contaminated surgical margin led to a significantly higher rate of local recurrence (as did a narrow surgical margin less than 1 mm). A margin greater than 1 mm allowed a satisfactory outcome in terms of low local recurrence rates. In terms of overall survival, the failure to achieve a wide surgical margin (wide contaminated margin) led to an increased relative death rate. However, when the margin was not contaminated (even if the margin was very close, less than 1 mm), the overall survival rate was similar across all groups. Patients who had radical resections did poorly; they generally belonged to a group in which palliative surgery was carried out, and they showed very high relative metastasis and death rates. Conclusion:  The present study provides statistically significant evidence that increasing the width of resection improves local control and overall survival.
Bibliography:ArticleID:ANS3615
ark:/67375/WNG-QRFR01ZX-N
istex:446D6D6D5E8EDD61CD62E57A9C871484AA0BCC28
MB BS, FRACS.
MB BS, MS
A. Duggal
N. Strobel
D. J. Whitwell
D. Battistuta
BM BS, FRCS
I. C. Dickinson
MB BS, FRACS
BSc
B. Thompson
BSc, PhD
;
P. Steadman
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1445-1433
1445-2197
DOI:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03615.x