Muscle mass predicts outcomes following liver transplantation

For patients with end‐stage liver disease, commonly used indices of nutritional status (ie, body weight and body mass index) are often inflated because of fluid overload (ie, ascites and peripheral edema), and this results in an underdiagnosis of malnutrition. Because muscle is the largest protein r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLiver transplantation Vol. 19; no. 11; pp. 1172 - 1180
Main Authors DiMartini, Andrea, Cruz, Ruy J., Dew, Mary Amanda, Myaskovsky, Larissa, Goodpaster, Bret, Fox, Kristen, Kim, Kevin H., Fontes, Paulo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For patients with end‐stage liver disease, commonly used indices of nutritional status (ie, body weight and body mass index) are often inflated because of fluid overload (ie, ascites and peripheral edema), and this results in an underdiagnosis of malnutrition. Because muscle is the largest protein reservoir in the body, an estimate of the muscle mass may be a more reliable and valid estimate of nutritional status. Therefore, we used pretransplant computed tomography data for 338 liver transplantation (LT) candidates to identify muscle and fat mass on the basis of a specific abdominal transverse section commonly used in body composition analyses, and we investigated the contribution of this measure to specific post‐LT outcomes. We found that the majority of our patients (68%) could be defined as cachectic. For men, muscle mass predicted many important posttransplant outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) stay, total length of stay (LOS), and days of intubation. Muscle mass was a significant predictor of survival and also predicted disposition to home versus another facility. For women, muscle mass predicted ICU stay, total LOS, and days of intubation, but the effect was modest. Muscle mass did not predict survival or disposition for women. In conclusion, because pretransplant muscle mass is associated with many important postoperative outcomes, we discuss these findings in the context of possible pretransplant interventions for either improving or sustaining muscle mass before surgery. Liver Transpl 19:1172‐1180, 2013. © 2013 AASLD.
Bibliography:Andrea DiMartini, Ruy J. Cruz Jr, Mary Amanda Dew, Bret Goodpaster, and Paulo Fontes contributed to the study concept and design. Andrea DiMartini, Ruy J. Cruz Jr, Bret Goodpaster, and Kristen Fox contributed to the acquisition of data. Andrea DiMartini, Ruy J. Cruz Jr, Mary Amanda Dew, Larissa Myaskovsky, Bret Goodpaster, Kristen Fox, Kevin H. Kim, and Paulo Fontes contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. Andrea DiMartini, Ruy J. Cruz Jr, Mary Amanda Dew, Larissa Myaskovsky, Bret Goodpaster, Kristen Fox, Kevin H. Kim, and Paulo Fontes contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. Andrea DiMartini, Ruy J. Cruz Jr, Mary Amanda Dew, Larissa Myaskovsky, and Kevin H. Kim contributed to the statistical analysis.
The contents of this article do not reflect the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US Government.
This research was funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (grant R01 DK066266 and administrative supplement NOT‐OD‐09‐056N) and by the National Center for Research Resources (a component of the National Institutes of Health) and the National Institutes of Health Roadmap for Medical Research (grant 5UL1 RR024153‐04). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Center for Research Resources, or the National Institutes of Health. Information on the National Center for Research Resources is available at
http://www.ncrr.nih.gov
.
The authors of this article have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1527-6465
1527-6473
DOI:10.1002/lt.23724