Limited impact of COVID‐19‐related diagnostic delay on cutaneous melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma tumour characteristics: a nationwide pathology registry analysis

Background The COVID‐19 pandemic reduced the number of skin cancer diagnoses, potentially causing a progression to unfavourable tumour stages. Objectives To identify the impact of delayed diagnostics on primary invasive melanoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) by comparing tumour (pT) s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of dermatology (1951) Vol. 187; no. 2; pp. 196 - 202
Main Authors Sangers, Tobias E., Wakkee, Marlies, Kramer‐Noels, Eline C., Nijsten, Tamar, Louwman, Marieke W.J., Jaspars, Elisabeth H., Hollestein, Loes M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.08.2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background The COVID‐19 pandemic reduced the number of skin cancer diagnoses, potentially causing a progression to unfavourable tumour stages. Objectives To identify the impact of delayed diagnostics on primary invasive melanoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) by comparing tumour (pT) stage, Breslow thickness and invasion depth from before to after the first and second lockdown periods. Methods In this population‐based cohort study, histopathology reports registered between 1 January 2018 and 22 July 2021 were obtained from the nationwide histopathology registry in the Netherlands. The Breslow thickness of melanomas, invasion depth of cSCCs, and pT stage for both tumour types were compared across five time periods: (i) pre‐COVID, (ii) first lockdown, (iii) between first and second lockdowns, (iv) second lockdown and (v) after second lockdown. Breslow thickness was compared using an independent t‐test. pT‐stage groups were compared using a χ2‐test. Outcomes were corrected for multiple testing using the false discovery rate. Results In total, 20 434 primary invasive melanomas and 68 832 cSCCs were included in this study. The mean primary melanoma Breslow thickness of the prepandemic era (period i) and the following time periods (ii–v) showed no significant difference. A small shift was found towards unfavourable pT stages during the first lockdown compared with the pre‐COVID period: pT1 52·3% vs. 58·6%, pT2 18·9% vs. 17·8%, pT3 13·2% vs. 11·0%, pT4 9·1% vs. 7·3% (P = 0·001). No relevant changes were seen in subsequent periods. No significant change in pT stage distribution was observed between the pre‐COVID (i) and COVID‐affected periods (ii–v) for cSCCs. Conclusions To date, the diagnostic delay caused by COVID‐19 has not resulted in relatively more unfavourable primary tumour characteristics of melanoma or cSCC. Follow‐up studies in the coming years are needed to identify a potential impact on staging distribution and survival in the long term. Linked Comment: F. Ricci and D. Abeni. Br J Dermatol 2022; 187:135–136.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conflicts of interest M.W. has participated as an advisory board member for Sanofi Genzyme, LEO Pharma and Sun Pharma, for which she received a financial reimbursement, and she is the principal investigator of various investigator‐initiated studies sponsored by Sanofi Genzyme, MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre and Novartis. T.E.S. has received speakers’ honoraria from Janssen‐Cilag. All of the other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding sources None.
Data availability The data that support the findings of this study are available from the nationwide network and registry of histopathology and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA). Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for the current study. Data can be requested from PALGA.
Ethics statement The study was approved by the scientific board of the nationwide network and registry of histo‐ and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA) under reference numbers 2020‐172 and 2021‐13.
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/bjd.21050