Low-dose oral anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses: final report from the early self-management anticoagulation trial II

Aims In mechanical heart valve recipients, low-dose international normalized ratio (INR) self-management of oral anticoagulants can reduce the risk of developing thrombo-embolic events and improve long-term survival compared with INR control by a general practitioner. Here, we present data on the sa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean heart journal Vol. 28; no. 20; pp. 2479 - 2484
Main Authors Koertke, Heinrich, Zittermann, Armin, Tenderich, Gero, Wagner, Otto, El-Arousy, Mahmoud, Krian, Arno, Ennker, Juergen, Taborski, Uwe, Klövekorn, Wolf Peter, Moosdorf, Rainer, Saggau, Werner, Koerfer, Reiner
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.10.2007
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims In mechanical heart valve recipients, low-dose international normalized ratio (INR) self-management of oral anticoagulants can reduce the risk of developing thrombo-embolic events and improve long-term survival compared with INR control by a general practitioner. Here, we present data on the safety of low-dose INR self-management. Methods and results In a prospective, randomized multi-centre trial, 1346 patients with a target INR range of 2.5–4.5 and 1327 patients with a target INR range of 1.8–2.8 for aortic valve recipients and an INR range of 2.5–3.5 for mitral or double valve recipients were followed up for 24 months. The incidence of thrombo-embolic events that required hospital admission was 0.37 and 0.19% per patient year in the conventional and low-dose groups, respectively (P = 0.79). No thrombo-embolic events occurred in the subgroups of patients with mitral or double valve replacement. The incidence of bleeding events that required hospital admission was 1.52 and 1.42%, respectively (P = 0.69). In the majority of patients with bleeding events, INR values were < 3.0. Mortality rate did not differ between the study groups. Conclusion Data demonstrate that low-dose INR self-management does not increase the risk of thrombo-embolic events compared with conventional dose INR self-management. Even in patients with low INR target range, the risk of bleeding events is still higher than the risk of thrombo-embolism.
Bibliography:istex:808FC8493995492AE373172E9CC4E3450C95FC53
related-article-ID:RA1
ArticleID:ehm391
ark:/67375/HXZ-1S5J9N5D-N
Related-article-href:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm405
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm391