Impact of a Cancer History on Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Myocardial Infarction Who Received Revascularization

Background: It remains controversial whether a cancer history increases the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) who undergo revascularization.Methods and Results: Patients who were confirmed as type 1 acute MI (AMI) by coronary angiography were retrospec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation Journal Vol. 88; no. 2; pp. 207 - 214
Main Authors Takeuchi, Taro, Kosugi, Shumpei, Ueda, Yasunori, Ikeoka, Kuniyasu, Yamane, Haruya, Takayasu, Kohtaro, Ohashi, Takuya, Fukushima, Takashi, Horiuchi, Kohei, Iehara, Takashi, Sakamoto, Mai, Ukai, Kazuho, Minami, Shinya, Mizumori, Yuuki, Muraoka, Naoya, Nakamura, Masayuki, Ozaki, Tatsuhisa, Mishima, Tsuyoshi, Abe, Haruhiko, Inoue, Koichi, Matsumura, Yasushi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Circulation Society 25.01.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: It remains controversial whether a cancer history increases the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) who undergo revascularization.Methods and Results: Patients who were confirmed as type 1 acute MI (AMI) by coronary angiography were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who died in hospital or those not undergoing revascularization were excluded. Patients with a cancer history were compared with those without it. A cancer history was examined in the in-hospital cancer registry. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, recurrent type 1 MI, post-discharge coronary revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, and stroke. Among 551 AMI patients, 55 had a cancer history (cancer group) and 496 did not (non-cancer group). Cox proportional hazards model revealed that the risk of composite endpoint was significantly higher in the cancer group than in the non-cancer group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13–2.82). Among the cancer group, patients who were diagnosed as AMI within 6 months after the cancer diagnosis had a higher risk of the composite endpoint than those who were diagnosed as AMI 6 months or later after the cancer diagnosis (adjusted HR: 5.43; 95% CI: 1.55–19.07).Conclusions: A cancer history increased the risk of CV events after discharge among AMI patients after revascularization.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1346-9843
1347-4820
1347-4820
DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0838