APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 Variants in Alzheimer’s Disease: Systematic Re-evaluation According to ACMG Guidelines

The strategies of classifying APP , PSEN1 , and PSEN2 variants varied substantially in the previous studies. We aimed to re-evaluate these variants systematically according to the American college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines. In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in aging neuroscience Vol. 13; p. 695808
Main Authors Xiao, Xuewen, Liu, Hui, Liu, Xixi, Zhang, Weiwei, Zhang, Sizhe, Jiao, Bin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lausanne Frontiers Research Foundation 18.06.2021
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The strategies of classifying APP , PSEN1 , and PSEN2 variants varied substantially in the previous studies. We aimed to re-evaluate these variants systematically according to the American college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines. In our study, APP , PSEN1 , and PSEN2 variants were collected by searching Alzforum and PubMed database with keywords “PSEN1,” “PSEN2,” and “APP.” These variants were re-evaluated based on the ACMG-AMP guidelines. We compared the number of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants of APP , PSEN1 , and PSEN2 . In total, 66 APP variants, 323 PSEN1 variants, and 63 PSEN2 variants were re-evaluated in our study. 94.91% of previously reported pathogenic variants were re-classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, while 5.09% of them were variants of uncertain significance (VUS). PSEN1 carried the most prevalent pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, followed by APP and PSEN2 . Significant statistically difference was identified among these three genes when comparing the number of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants ( P < 2.2 × 10 –16 ). Most of the previously reported pathogenic variants were re-classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants while the others were re-evaluated as VUS, highlighting the importance of interpreting APP , PSEN1 , and PSEN2 variants with caution according to ACMG-AMP guidelines.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Francesca Luisa Conforti, University of Calabria, Italy; Diego Castillo-Barnes, University of Granada, Spain
Edited by: Nicola Ticozzi, University of Milan, Italy
ISSN:1663-4365
1663-4365
DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2021.695808