Pattern formation during electrochemical and liquid metal dealloying

Dealloying has evolved from a problematic corrosion process to a versatile tool for scalable fabrication of nanostructured metals. While the original, and majority of, work in the area has focused on electrochemical dealloying, a powerful variation of dealloying—liquid metal dealloying—has recently...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMRS bulletin Vol. 43; no. 1; pp. 27 - 34
Main Authors McCue, Ian, Karma, Alain, Erlebacher, Jonah
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.01.2018
Springer International Publishing
Springer Nature B.V
Materials Research Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Dealloying has evolved from a problematic corrosion process to a versatile tool for scalable fabrication of nanostructured metals. While the original, and majority of, work in the area has focused on electrochemical dealloying, a powerful variation of dealloying—liquid metal dealloying—has recently gained popularity. This process relies on a melt to carry out selective dissolution, replacing the traditional electrolyte solution. While electrolytes and molten metals are both suitable dealloying media, they can lead to very different morphologies. In this article, we compare and contrast what is known about the microscale physics and chemistry controlling microstructural evolution in electrochemical and liquid metal dealloying. We conclude that the core phenomenology of porosity evolution—a competition between dissolution and interface diffusion—is similar in both dealloying processes, but that the relative magnitudes of these two processes control interfacial pattern formation.
Bibliography:FG02-07ER46400
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
ISSN:0883-7694
1938-1425
DOI:10.1557/mrs.2017.301