cDC1 prime and are licensed by CD4+ T cells to induce anti-tumour immunity

Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1) 1 are thought to perform antigen cross-presentation, which is required to prime CD8 + T cells 2 , 3 , whereas cDC2 are specialized for priming CD4 + T cells 4 , 5 . CD4 + T cells are also considered to help CD8 + T cell responses through a variety of mechan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature (London) Vol. 584; no. 7822; pp. 624 - 629
Main Authors Ferris, Stephen T., Durai, Vivek, Wu, Renee, Theisen, Derek J., Ward, Jeffrey P., Bern, Michael D., Davidson, Jesse T., Bagadia, Prachi, Liu, Tiantian, Briseño, Carlos G., Li, Lijin, Gillanders, William E., Wu, Gregory F., Yokoyama, Wayne M., Murphy, Theresa L., Schreiber, Robert D., Murphy, Kenneth M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 27.08.2020
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1) 1 are thought to perform antigen cross-presentation, which is required to prime CD8 + T cells 2 , 3 , whereas cDC2 are specialized for priming CD4 + T cells 4 , 5 . CD4 + T cells are also considered to help CD8 + T cell responses through a variety of mechanisms 6 – 11 , including a process whereby CD4 + T cells ‘license’ cDC1 for CD8 + T cell priming 12 . However, this model has not been directly tested in vivo or in the setting of help-dependent tumour rejection. Here we generated an Xcr1 Cre mouse strain to evaluate the cellular interactions that mediate tumour rejection in a model requiring CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. As expected, tumour rejection required cDC1 and CD8 + T cell priming required the expression of major histocompatibility class I molecules by cDC1. Unexpectedly, early priming of CD4 + T cells against tumour-derived antigens also required cDC1, and this was not simply because they transport antigens to lymph nodes for processing by cDC2, as selective deletion of major histocompatibility class II molecules in cDC1 also prevented early CD4 + T cell priming. Furthermore, deletion of either major histocompatibility class II or CD40 in cDC1 impaired tumour rejection, consistent with a role for cognate CD4 + T cell interactions and CD40 signalling in cDC1 licensing. Finally, CD40 signalling in cDC1 was critical not only for CD8 + T cell priming, but also for initial CD4 + T cell activation. Thus, in the setting of tumour-derived antigens, cDC1 function as an autonomous platform capable of antigen processing and priming for both CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and of the direct orchestration of their cross-talk that is required for optimal anti-tumour immunity. Conventional type 1 dendritic cells perform antigen processing and priming of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells against tumour antigens, orchestrating their cross-talk to effect anti-tumour immunity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work.
S.T.F., R.W., and V.D. conceived and designed the experiments, collected the data, performed and interpreted the analyses, and wrote the manuscript. J.T.D., P.B., D.J.T., T.L., L.L, and C.G.B collected and analysed data. J.P.W. and D.T. helped generate the 1956-mOVA fibrosarcoma cell line. M.D.B. provided the β2mfl mouse and interpreted the analyses. G.F.U., W.M.Y., W. E. G., T.L.M., and R.D.S provided assistance with experimental design. K.M.M conceived experiments, interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript.
Present address: Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
Author Contributions
ISSN:0028-0836
1476-4687
DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2611-3