Bilateral, simultaneous cochlear implantation in children: surgical considerations

The advantages of bilateral, simultaneous cochlear implantation include: the possibility to pre-empt cochlear calcification following meningitis; reduction of the intervention to only one procedure, general anaesthetic and course of clinical care (with obvious benefits for the patient); and greater...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of laryngology and otology Vol. 123; no. 8; pp. 837 - 839
Main Authors Migirov, L, Kronenberg, J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.08.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The advantages of bilateral, simultaneous cochlear implantation include: the possibility to pre-empt cochlear calcification following meningitis; reduction of the intervention to only one procedure, general anaesthetic and course of clinical care (with obvious benefits for the patient); and greater cost-effectiveness. The disadvantages of such a procedure include: doubling the risk of associated complications; placing the patient on the implanted side during contralateral implantation; the possibility of vestibular alteration simultaneously in both ears; the need for precise planning of symmetrical incisions and implant sites; and longer surgery time. The study cohort included 10 children who underwent bilateral, simultaneous cochlear implantation using the suprameatal approach. The overall operation time, inclusive of anaesthesia, was approximately three hours in all cases. None of the children had any intra- or post-operative complications. From a surgical perspective, bilateral, simultaneous cochlear implantation is a safe procedure. The use of a non-mastoidectomy approach is recommended.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/6GQ-9N7Q95PN-6
istex:77D68886B15A537DE2E58177241F8591370E4223
PII:S0022215109004824
ArticleID:00482
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-2151
1748-5460
DOI:10.1017/S0022215109004824