Effects of straw and plastic film mulching on greenhouse gas emissions in Loess Plateau, China: A field study of 2 consecutive wheat-maize rotation cycles

• Published in: The Science of the total environment Vol. 579; pp. 814 - 824
• Main Authors: Chen, Haixin, Liu, Jingjing, Zhang, Afeng, Chen, Jing, Cheng, Gong, Sun, Benhua, Pi, Xiaomin, Dyck, Miles, Si, Bingcheng, Zhao, Ying, Feng, Hao
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.02.2017
• Subjects: Greenhouse gas emissions; Mulching; Triticum aestivum; Wheat-maize rotation field; Zea mays; China, People's Rep., Loess Plateau; China, People's Rep; Wheat-maize rotation field; Mulching; Greenhouse gas emissions
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.022

Mulching practices have long been used to modify the soil temperature and moisture conditions and thus potentially improve crop production in dryland agriculture, but few studies have focused on mulching effects on soil gaseous emissions. We monitored annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under the regime of straw and plastic film mulching using a closed chamber method on a typical winter-wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Xiaoyan 22) and summer-maize (Zea mays L. cv Qinlong 11) rotation field over two-year period in the Loess Plateau, northwestern China. The following four field treatments were included: T1 (control, no mulching), T2 (4000kgha−1 wheat straw mulching, covering 100% of soil surface), T3 (half plastic film mulching, covering 50% of soil surface), and T4 (complete plastic film mulching, covering 100% of soil surface). Compared with the control, straw mulching decreased soil temperature and increased soil moisture, whereas plastic film mulching increased both soil temperature and moisture. Accordingly, straw mulching increased annual crop yields over both cycles, while plastic film mulching significantly enhanced annual crop yield over cycle 2. Compared to the no-mulching treatment, all mulching treatments increased soil CO2 emission over both cycles, and straw mulching increased soil CH4 absorption over both cycles, but patterns of soil N2O emissions under straw or film mulching are not consistent. Overall, compared to T1, annual GHG intensity was significantly decreased by 106%, 24% and 26% under T2, T3 and T4 over cycle 1, respectively; and by 20%, 51% and 29% under T2, T3 and T4 over cycle 2, respectively. Considering the additional cost and environmental issues associated with plastic film mulching, the application of straw mulching might achieve a balance between food security and GHG emissions in the Chinese Loess Plateau. However, further research is required to investigate the perennial influence of different mulching applications. [Display omitted] •Crop yields were significantly increased by straw mulching over both cycles, and by plastic film mulching in cycle 2.•Both straw and film mulching significantly increased soil CO2 emission over both cycles.•Patterns of soil N2O emissions under straw or film mulching are not consistent.•Both straw and film mulching significantly decreased annual GHGI.•Straw mulching is recommended in Loess Plateau, China.