Integrating viral hepatitis management into the emergency department: A further step towards viral hepatitis elimination

Many people with HCV and HBV infection are unaware of their condition, particularly at-risk and vulnerable populations who face barriers for screening and linkage to care. Emergency departments are often their only point of contact with the health system. This is a prospective study investigating HB...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJHEP reports Vol. 6; no. 1; p. 100932
Main Authors Llaneras, Jordi, Ruiz-Cobo, Juan Carlos, Rando-Segura, Ariadna, Barreira-Díaz, Ana, Domínguez-Hernández, Raquel, Rodríguez-Frías, Francisco, Campins, Magda, Colom, Joan, Casado, Miguel Angel, Blanco-Grau, Albert, Bañares, Juan, Monforte, Arnau, Falcó-Roget, Anna, Ruíz, Lourdes, Meza, Beatriz, Pumarola, Tomàs, Riveiro-Barciela, Mar, Esteban, Rafael, Buti, María
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.01.2024
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Many people with HCV and HBV infection are unaware of their condition, particularly at-risk and vulnerable populations who face barriers for screening and linkage to care. Emergency departments are often their only point of contact with the health system. This is a prospective study investigating HBsAg and HCV antibody testing, with reflex testing for HDV antibodies and HCV RNA, in adults attending an emergency department and requiring a blood test. Positive cases were linked to care. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. From February 2020 to February 2022, a total of 17,560 individuals were screened. HBsAg was detected in 91 (0.5%), HCV RNA in 128 (0.7%), and HDV antibodies in two (0.01%) individuals. Nearly 40% of positive cases were unaware of their condition. Linkage to care was achieved in 42 of 56 HBsAg-positive and 45 of 69 HCV RNA-positive participants who were candidates for referral. HCV and HBV screening vs. no screening yielded 1.06 and 0.42 additional quality-adjusted life-years, respectively, with incremental cost–utility ratios of €7,629 and -€147 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively, and proved even more cost-effective in patients with hepatitis C aged 40–70 years. On emergency department screening for hepatitis B, C, and D in Barcelona, the prevalence of HBsAg was 0.5% and HCV RNA 0.7%, approximately threefold higher than that observed in the general population. This strategy diagnosed patients with active HCV infection and no risk factors, who would not have been screened according to the current recommendations. Screening and linkage to care of viral hepatitis is cost-effective in this setting. We evaluated the performance and cost-effectiveness of a viral hepatitis screening programme implemented in an emergency department, which aimed to identify and link to care people living with hepatitis B and C. Our findings reveal a threefold higher prevalence of hepatitis B and C than in the general Spanish population, possibly attributable to the role of the emergency department as the main healthcare gateway for vulnerable populations, who have a higher prevalence of viral hepatitis. Risk factors for viral hepatitis could not be identified in most people living with hepatitis B and C attending the emergency department; hence, screening beyond risk factors should be considered in hepatitis detection strategies. Emergency department screening is cost-effective for hepatitis C and is a cost-saving strategy for hepatitis B in our setting. These data should inform future updates to clinical guidelines. [Display omitted] •HCV/HBV prevalence at ED is threefold higher than that in the general population.•Forty percent of people living with HCV or HBV were unaware of the infection.•Risk factors for viral hepatitis were not identified in 60% of those with HCV and 92% of those with HBV.•Screening for HCV and HBV in the ED is cost-effective.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2589-5559
2589-5559
DOI:10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100932