Face and content validation of a Virtual Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery Trainer (VTEST™)

• Published in: Surgical endoscopy Vol. 30; no. 12; pp. 5529 - 5536
• Main Authors: Dorozhkin, Denis, Nemani, Arun, Roberts, Kurt, Ahn, Woojin, Halic, Tansel, Dargar, Saurabh, Wang, Jinling, Cao, Caroline G. L., Sankaranarayanan, Ganesh, De, Suvranu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.12.2016; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Cholecystectomy; Cholecystectomy - education; Cholecystectomy - instrumentation; Cholecystectomy - methods; Computer science; Consortia; Endoscopy; Female; Gastroenterology; Gynecology; Hepatology; Humans; Laparoscopy; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - education; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - instrumentation; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods; Proctology; Simulation Training - methods; Surgeons; Surgery; Task analysis; Training; United States; User-Computer Interface; Vagina; Vagina - surgery; Validity; Virtual reality; United States > US; NOTES; Surgical performance metrics; Virtual surgical simulation; Natural orifice surgery; Surgical training
• ISSN: 0930-2794; 1432-2218
• DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4917-7

Background Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an emerging surgical paradigm, where peritoneal access is achieved through one of the natural orifices of the body. It is being reported as a safe and feasible surgical technique with significantly reduced external scarring. Virtual Translumenal Endoscopic Surgical Trainer (VTEST™) is the first virtual reality simulator for the NOTES. The VTEST™ simulator was developed to train surgeons in the hybrid transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy procedure. The initial version of the VTEST™ simulator underwent face validation at the 2013 Natural Orifice Surgery Consortium for Assessment and Research (NOSCAR) summit. Several areas of improvement were identified as a result, and the corresponding modifications were implemented in the simulator. This manuscript outlines the results of the subsequent evaluation study, performed in order to assess the face and content validity of the latest VTEST™ simulator. Methods Twelve subjects participated in an institutional review board-approved study that took place at the 2014 NOSCAR summit. Six of the 12 subjects, who are experts with NOTES experience, were used for face and content validation. The subjects performed the hybrid transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy procedure on VTEST™ that included identifying the Calot’s triangle, clipping and cutting the cystic duct/artery, and detaching the gallbladder. The subjects then answered five-point Likert scale feedback questionnaires for face and content validity. Results Overall, subjects rated 12/15 questions as 3.0 or greater (60 %), for face validity questions regarding the realism of the anatomical features, interface, and the tasks. Subjects also highly rated the usefulness of the simulator in learning the fundamental NOTES technical skills (3.50 ± 0.84). Content validity results indicate a high level of usefulness of the VTEST™ for training prior to operating room experience (4.17 ± 0.75).