Endometrial “Scratching” An update and overview of current research

• Published in: Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 124 - 129
• Main Authors: Günther, Veronika, von Otte, Sören, Maass, Nicolai, Alkatout, Ibrahim
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Istanbul Turkish-German Gynecological Association 01.06.2020; Galenos Publishing House; Galenos Publishing
• Subjects: Biopsy; Catheters; Cervix; Cytokines; Embryos; Endometriosis; Endometrium; Gynecology; Immunology; In vitro fertilization; Infertility; Pregnancy; Review; Tıp; Tumor necrosis factor-TNF; Uterus; İstanbul; reproductive immunology; Infertility; perinatal immunology and inflammation
• ISSN: 1309-0399; 1309-0380
• DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2019.0175

About one in every six couples is affected by sterility. Assisted reproduction procedures are currently the treatment of choice for a number of patients who desire children. Many causes of sterility can be overcome with the aid of in vitro fertilization, but successful implantation of the embryos is the major limiting factor. Failure of implantation may occur repetitively. In the treatment of sterility, many approaches have been used to overcome the barrier of implantation failure and improve the chances of successful nidation. Scratching the endometrium prior to embryo transfer has been suggested as one means of enhancing the likelihood of implantation. The current literature was examined to investigate if there was any possible benefit from endometrial scratching. The studies were divided according to whether the women suffered from recurrent implantation failure or not. In summary, it was found that unselected subfertile women generally benefit less from endometrial scratching, but scratching appears to be successful in women who have experienced repeated implantation failure. Although the heterogeneous body of data on the subject deserves further clarification. The latest data presented at “European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology” 2018 in Barcelona suggested that the method should be abandoned. (J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2020; 21: 124-9)