Allosteric modulation of a human protein kinase with monobodies

Despite being the subject of intense effort and scrutiny, kinases have proven to be consistently challenging targets in inhibitor drug design. A key obstacle has been promiscuity and consequent adverse effects of drugs targeting the ATP binding site. Here we introduce an approach to controlling kina...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 116; no. 28; pp. 13937 - 13942
Main Authors Zorba, Adelajda, Nguyen, Vy, Koide, Akiko, Hoemberger, Marc, Zheng, Yuejiao, Kutter, Steffen, Kim, Chansik, Koide, Shohei, Kern, Dorothee
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 09.07.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Despite being the subject of intense effort and scrutiny, kinases have proven to be consistently challenging targets in inhibitor drug design. A key obstacle has been promiscuity and consequent adverse effects of drugs targeting the ATP binding site. Here we introduce an approach to controlling kinase activity by using monobodies that bind to the highly specific regulatory allosteric pocket of the oncoprotein Aurora A (AurA) kinase, thereby offering the potential for more specific kinase modulators. Strikingly, we identify a series of highly specific monobodies acting either as strong kinase inhibitors or activators via differential recognition of structural motifs in the allosteric pocket. X-ray crystal structures comparing AurA bound to activating vs inhibiting monobodies reveal the atomistic mechanism underlying allosteric modulation. The results reveal 3 major advantages of targeting allosteric vs orthosteric sites: extreme selectivity, ability to inhibit as well as activate, and avoidance of competing with ATP that is present at high concentrations in the cells. We envision that exploiting allosteric networks for inhibition or activation will provide a general, powerful pathway toward rational drug design.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
FG02-05ER15699; AC02-05CH11231; AC02-76SF00515; GM100966; R01-GM090324; R01-CA194864; P30CA014599
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
5Present address: Protein Production Group, Xtal BioStructures, Natick, MA 01760.
3Present address: Biomolecular Discovery, Relay Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02139.
2Present address: Physical Biochemistry and Bioassay Groups, Biogen, Biotherapeutic and Medicinal Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Edited by Joseph Puglisi, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, and approved June 5, 2019 (received for review April 10, 2019)
Author contributions: A.Z., V.N., S. Koide, and D.K. designed research; A.Z., V.N., A.K., M.H., Y.Z., S. Kutter, and C.K. performed research; A.Z., V.N., A.K., M.H., Y.Z., S. Kutter, C.K., and S. Koide contributed new reagents/analytic tools; A.Z., V.N., A.K., M.H., Y.Z., S. Kutter, and C.K. analyzed data; and A.Z., V.N., M.H., and D.K. wrote the paper.
1A.Z. and V.N. contributed equally to this work.
4Present address: Medical Scientist Training Program, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1906024116