Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in the APPROACH trial (assessment on the prevention of progression by Rosiglitazone on atherosclerosis in diabetes patients with cardiovascular history)

To determine (1) the medium-term effect of rosiglitazone and glipizide on intra-stent neointima hyperplasia, (2) restenosis pattern as assessed by intra-vascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in patients with T2DM and coronary artery disease. A total of 462 patients w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 455 - 465
Main Authors García-García, Héctor M., Garg, Scot, Brugaletta, Salvatore, Morocutti, Giorgio, Ratner, Robert E., Kolatkar, Nikheel S., Kravitz, Barbara G., Miller, Diane M., Huang, Chun, Nesto, Richard W., Serruys, Patrick W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.03.2012
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To determine (1) the medium-term effect of rosiglitazone and glipizide on intra-stent neointima hyperplasia, (2) restenosis pattern as assessed by intra-vascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in patients with T2DM and coronary artery disease. A total of 462 patients with T2DM were randomized to rosiglitazone or glipizide for up to 18 months in the APPROACH trial, and had evaluable baseline and follow-up IVUS examinations. There was no significant difference in the size of plaque behind stent between the rosiglitazone and glipizide groups at 18 months among those treated with a bare metal stent (−5.6 mm 3 vs. 1.9 mm 3 ; P  = 0.61) or with a drug-eluting stent (12.1 mm 3 vs. 5.5 mm 3 ; P  = 0.09). Similarly, there was no significant difference in percentage intimal hyperplasia volume between the rosiglitazone and glipizide groups at 18 months among those treated with a bare metal stent (24.1% vs. 19.8%; P  = 0.38) or with a drug-eluting stent (9.8% vs. 8.3%; P  = 0.57). QCA data (intra-stent late loss, intra-stent diameter stenosis or binary restenosis) were not different between the rosiglitazone and glipizide groups. This study suggests that both rosiglitazone and glipizide have a similar effect on neointimal growth at medium term follow-up, a finding that warrants investigation in dedicated randomized trials.
ISSN:1569-5794
1573-0743
1875-8312
DOI:10.1007/s10554-011-9836-z